Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) in Combination with Chemotherapy for First-LINE Treatment of Metastatic Squamous NON-SMALL Cell LUNG Cancer (NSCLC) in France
Author(s)
Chouaid C1, Bensimon L2, Tardu J3, Millier A3, Insinga R4, Rai A5, Levy-Bachelot L2, Levy P6
1Department of Chest Medicine, Créteil University Hospital, Créteil, France, 2MSD France, Puteaux, France, 3Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France, 4Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA, 5Complete HEOR Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA, 6Université Paris- Dauphine, PSL Research University, LEDA[LEGOS], Paris, France
OBJECTIVES : To describe the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin + paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel for first-line treatment of metastatic squamous NSCLC, from the French healthcare system perspective. METHODS : A previously published partitioned-survival model was adapted to fit with French HTA guidelines for economic evaluation. Clinical and quality of life (QoL) data were derived from KEYNOTE-407, a phase-III randomized controlled trial comparing pembrolizumab+carboplatin+paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel vs. carboplatin+paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel alone in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC (cut-off date: April 3, 2018). An indirect treatment comparison was performed to consider pembrolizumab as monotherapy in high-expressing tumors (PD-L1≥50%). Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) estimates from the trial were extrapolated over a 10-year time horizon using a piecewise modelling approach based on parametric functions. EQ-5D QoL data were converted to French population-based utility values using a published algorithm. Only direct medical costs were considered, based on public sources (incl. list price). Costs and health outcomes were discounted at 4% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated as a cost per life-year (LY) or quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity and scenarios analyses assessed robustness of results. RESULTS : Per patient, pembrolizumab in combination was projected to increase discounted life expectancy by 0.59 LY and 0.46 QALY with an incremental cost of €53,292 compared with carboplatin+paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel alone. ICERs were €90,669/LY and €116,606/QALY. Results were most sensitive to OS extrapolations, assumptions for continued effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination and duration of subsequent treatment. Interpretation of results vs. pembrolizumab monotherapy in the PD-L1 ≥50% subgroup was limited due to a high degree of uncertainty in relative outcomes for OS. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold ≥ €165,000/QALY, pembrolizumab in combination has a ≥ 80% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS : Combining pembrolizumab with carboplatin+paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel substantially improves life expectancy and appears cost-effective vs. carboplatin+paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel alone for first-line treatment of metastatic squamous NSCLC in France, assuming a WTP under €165,000/QALY.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PCN64
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Drugs, Oncology, Personalized and Precision Medicine