Cost-Effectiveness Model Adapted to Italian Clinical Practice for Evaluation of Entrectinib Versus Crizotinib in ROS1+ NSCLC Patients

Author(s)

Bellone M1, Pradelli L1, Gancitano G2, Orfanos P3
1AdRes HEOR, Torino, TO, Italy, 2Roche Diagnostics S.p.A., Monza, Italy, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES : Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinases inhibitor (TKI) targeting ROS1-fusion proteins; in NSCLC, it inhibits tyrosine kinases encoded by the gene ROS1. Most recent clinical data in conjunction with Italian clinical practice inputs are used in a previously developed international AUC model in order to estimate its cost-effectiveness in the treatment of ROS1+ NSCLC relative to crizotinib, the TKI currently approved in Italy.

METHODS : Proportion of patients within each health state are based on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves, estimated by parametric extrapolation of observed data from the pooled entrectinib trials; given the lack of head-to-head studies, a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) has been carried out to estimate hazard ratios vs. crizotinib. Economical inputs on oral drug costs, adverse events management, and supportive care are based on national literature data and current tariffs. Drugs are costed based on protocol/label planned dose and observed length of treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assess the impact of uncertainty surrounding the variables estimates.

RESULTS : The model estimates that entrectinib, when compared to crizotinib, induces a survival gain of 1.4 life years in the post-progression phase. The associated costs increase by about 115K €, mainly due to acquisition costs of entrectinib, longer TKI treatment duration and improvement of life expectancy, leading to an ICER around 90K €/LY.

CONCLUSIONS : Entrectinib increases expected survival in ROS1+ NSCLC patients with respect to crizotinib. ROS1-positive NSCLC may be considered as a rare disease, making such an ICER potentially acceptable considering its effectiveness and safety profile in a developed country as Italy. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously: limitations are due to the ineluctable indirect comparison approach and poor knowledge on the natural history of the ROS1-NSCLC population that make the analysis subject to considerable uncertainty.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCN66

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, Drugs, Oncology, Personalized and Precision Medicine

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×