A Mixed-Methods Analysis to Define Minimum Clinically Importance Differences (MCIDs) in Range of Motion, Physical Function, and Worst Stiffness in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT)

Author(s)

Gelhorn H1, Cutts K1, Fikre T1, Han Y1, Tait C2, Zeringo N2, Saunders A2, Harrow B3
1Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA, 3Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Burlington, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm that involves the synovium, bursae, or tendon sheath. Tumor location varies and is often associated with joint destruction, pain, stiffness, and limited range of motion (ROM). The objective of the current analysis was to define a meaningful change in clinical outcome assessments (COAs) measuring active range of motion, physical function and stiffness among patients with TGCT.

METHODS: Qualitative embedded exit interviews were conducted with patients participating in the double-blind MOTION Phase 3 trial (NCT05059262) of vimseltinib vs placebo for TGCT. Patients were asked about meaningful changes in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) anchors, active ROM, physical function (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) – Physical Function (PF)), and stiffness (Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)). Subsequent quantitative anchor (using PGIS and PGIC) and distribution-based analyses of the clinical trial data, informed by the results of the qualitative interviews, were used to triangulate and define meaningful within-patient changes. Analyses were conducted on blinded data prior to trial primary analyses.

RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were randomized in MOTION with 96 (78%) completing an exit interview. The PGIC anchor variables had moderate correlations with changes in the COA measures (range: |0.38 to 0.54|). The data for both the PGIC-PF and PGIC-ROM support that most patients (PGIC-PF: 67%; PGIC-ROM 73%) considered “minimally improved” responses on these questions to represent clinically meaningful changes. Anchor- and distribution-based estimates for PROMIS-PF ranged from 1.45 to 4.9, for active ROM from 6.0 to 16.4, and Worst Stiffness from -2.3 to -0.5.

CONCLUSIONS: Combined evidence from anchor and distribution-based methods supported by patient insights from qualitative interviews informed the final selection of MCIDs of +3-points for PROMIS-PF, +10% for active ROM, and -2-points for Worst Stiffness NRS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Acceptance Code

P14

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology, rare-orphan-diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×