What Is the HTA Process for Medical Technologies in Scotland?
Author(s)
Caoimhe Leonard, BSc, MSc1, Sheryl Warttig, BSc, MSc, DHealthPsy1, Liesl Gildea, BSc, MSc1, Margaret Mordin, MS2.
1RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
1RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Detailed, publicly available information on the process and methods for health technology assessment (HTA) of medical technologies (MTs) can be difficult to find. Our objective was to understand the process and methods used for HTAs of MT by the Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG).
METHODS: A review of publicly available information from the SHTG website was performed and supplemented with an online survey that was sent to and completed by SHTG. The survey requested information on the MT selection process, types of MT evaluated, and types of evidence considered within the HTA process. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained and collated in Excel.
RESULTS: The initial searches provided brief information about the process and methods used to review MTs. The online survey results revealed that the SHTG evaluates invasive and non-invasive devices, diagnostics, or digital technologies, such as apps or software. An internal process is used to select topics. The SHTG uses a general HTA process that covers all types of MTs (i.e., the same process is used for assessing devices, diagnostics, or digital technologies). It considers clinical and economic data as well as opinions from patients and healthcare professionals. The assessment by SHTG happens after regulatory approval, and it usually takes between 6 to 9 months to complete an HTA for MT.
CONCLUSIONS: A major challenge for MT companies is establishing whether a technology requires or is eligible for HTA in different markets. For MT evaluation in Scotland, information was publicly available, but direct contact with the SHTG revealed additional details. MT companies should be prepared to contact HTA agencies directly to obtain necessary information that informs evidence generation, market access strategies, and HTA submission plans.
METHODS: A review of publicly available information from the SHTG website was performed and supplemented with an online survey that was sent to and completed by SHTG. The survey requested information on the MT selection process, types of MT evaluated, and types of evidence considered within the HTA process. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained and collated in Excel.
RESULTS: The initial searches provided brief information about the process and methods used to review MTs. The online survey results revealed that the SHTG evaluates invasive and non-invasive devices, diagnostics, or digital technologies, such as apps or software. An internal process is used to select topics. The SHTG uses a general HTA process that covers all types of MTs (i.e., the same process is used for assessing devices, diagnostics, or digital technologies). It considers clinical and economic data as well as opinions from patients and healthcare professionals. The assessment by SHTG happens after regulatory approval, and it usually takes between 6 to 9 months to complete an HTA for MT.
CONCLUSIONS: A major challenge for MT companies is establishing whether a technology requires or is eligible for HTA in different markets. For MT evaluation in Scotland, information was publicly available, but direct contact with the SHTG revealed additional details. MT companies should be prepared to contact HTA agencies directly to obtain necessary information that informs evidence generation, market access strategies, and HTA submission plans.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2
Code
MT48
Topic
Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas