To What Endpoint? Exploring Clinical Outcome Assessments of Pain in Phase 2 and 3 Trials and Drug Labels in Women’s Health Conditions
Author(s)
Julia Stein, MRes, Melissa Lucy Barclay, BSc, MSc, Bethany Backhouse, BSc (Hons), Aishwarya Chohan, BSc (Hons), Anya Francis, BSc (Hons), Mauminah Chaudry, MSc, Iona Adams, MSc, Laura Grant, MSc.
Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.
Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: Pain is a prevalent, debilitating symptom across women’s health conditions, often significantly impacting quality of life. This study examined how pain is assessed in clinical trials, with a focus on exploring the prioritisation of pain within endpoint hierarchies, and in drug labels in women’s health.
METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched to identify phase 2 and 3 interventional trials in select women’s health conditions (e.g., dysmenorrhoea and endometriosis). Product labelling of treatments for pain associated with women’s health conditions were collected from the Drugs@FDA database. Searches were conducted in June 2025. Data on trial design, intervention, indication/s, endpoints, clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and label language were extracted.
RESULTS: A total of 535 trials were identified; endometriosis trials were most frequent (n=151/535, 28.2%), followed by fibroids and dysmenorrhoea. Fewer than half of the trials specifically referenced ‘pain’ in primary, secondary or other endpoint wording (n=205/535, 38.3%). Standalone visual analogue scales, numerical or verbal rating scales, disease-specific (e.g., Dysmenorrhea Daily Diary), and generic (e.g., short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire) COAs supported primary endpoints of pain. In the past 15 years, only two FDA-approved drugs for pain associated with a women’s health condition were identified, both for endometriosis; the Endometriosis Daily Pain Impact Scale, daily disease-specific numeric rating scales and the Endometriosis Health Profile pain domain supported co-primary/secondary endpoints and were included in product labelling. Other drugs for pain were approved prior to the FDA Patient-Reported Outcome guidance (2009) or for conditions generally also affecting males (e.g., fibromyalgia).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high volume of interventional trials in women’s health, particularly for endometriosis, less than half referenced assessments of pain in the endpoint wording, and few recent FDA-approved drugs for pain in women’s health conditions were identified. This underscores the unmet need for both pain-targeting therapies and prioritising appropriate assessments of pain in COA strategies within women’s health.
METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched to identify phase 2 and 3 interventional trials in select women’s health conditions (e.g., dysmenorrhoea and endometriosis). Product labelling of treatments for pain associated with women’s health conditions were collected from the Drugs@FDA database. Searches were conducted in June 2025. Data on trial design, intervention, indication/s, endpoints, clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and label language were extracted.
RESULTS: A total of 535 trials were identified; endometriosis trials were most frequent (n=151/535, 28.2%), followed by fibroids and dysmenorrhoea. Fewer than half of the trials specifically referenced ‘pain’ in primary, secondary or other endpoint wording (n=205/535, 38.3%). Standalone visual analogue scales, numerical or verbal rating scales, disease-specific (e.g., Dysmenorrhea Daily Diary), and generic (e.g., short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire) COAs supported primary endpoints of pain. In the past 15 years, only two FDA-approved drugs for pain associated with a women’s health condition were identified, both for endometriosis; the Endometriosis Daily Pain Impact Scale, daily disease-specific numeric rating scales and the Endometriosis Health Profile pain domain supported co-primary/secondary endpoints and were included in product labelling. Other drugs for pain were approved prior to the FDA Patient-Reported Outcome guidance (2009) or for conditions generally also affecting males (e.g., fibromyalgia).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high volume of interventional trials in women’s health, particularly for endometriosis, less than half referenced assessments of pain in the endpoint wording, and few recent FDA-approved drugs for pain in women’s health conditions were identified. This underscores the unmet need for both pain-targeting therapies and prioritising appropriate assessments of pain in COA strategies within women’s health.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2
Code
PCR245
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Reproductive & Sexual Health