Pain-Related Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Among Individuals With Cancer Evidence From the United States Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Author(s)

Bander Balkhi, PharmD, PhD1, Monira Alwhaibi, PhD2.
1Faculty Advisor, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between pain and healthcare expenditures among adults with cancer in the United States, and to quantify the extent to which sociodemographic and clinical characteristics explain observed cost differences.
METHODS: We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) for the period of 2019 to 2022, including adults (≥22 years) with a self-reported diagnosis of cancer (N=4,368). Pain status was defined based on patient-reported measures. We conducted weighted descriptive analyses and applied generalized linear models (GLM) with gamma distribution and log link to estimate incremental expenditures associated with pain. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to partition the differences in total healthcare expenditures into explained and unexplained components.
RESULTS: Among cancer patients, 55.0% reported experiencing pain. Individuals with pain had significantly higher unadjusted total annual healthcare expenditures compared to those without pain ($22,072 vs. $13,366; p<0.0001). After adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and health status variables, pain remained significantly associated with higher total costs (incremental cost: $4,473; 95% CI: $1,010-$6,936; p=0.001), driven largely by inpatient, outpatient, prescription, and emergency services. Decomposition analysis indicated that 64.0% of the expenditure difference was explained by observed characteristics—most notably perceived health status and comorbidities (e.g., heart disease, COPD). The remaining 36.0% was unexplained, suggesting potential unmeasured disparities in care delivery or pain severity
CONCLUSIONS: Pain is associated with substantial increases in healthcare expenditures among individuals with cancer, even after accounting for differences in health and sociodemographic characteristics. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions and equitable pain management strategies to reduce economic burden and improve cancer care outcomes for those patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

CO176

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×