Multinational Qualitative Testing of the Experimental EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS) Instrument

Author(s)

Janine Verstraete, PhD1, Maria Belizan, MsC2, Elia Bidgood, MPH3, Fatima Al Sayah, PhD4, Samar Farid, PhD5, Ole Marten, PhD6, Nan Luo, PhD7, Kristina Ludwig, DrPH8, Fanni Rencz, PhD9, Michael Herdman, MSc7, Aureliano Paolo Finch, PhD10, Jill Carlton, PhD11, Tessa Peasgood, PhD3.
1Researcher, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, CABA, Argentina, 3University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 4University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 6School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany, 7National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 8Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany, 9Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, 10EuroQol Research Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the content validity of the EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS), an experimental generic proxy-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument, to inform refinement of its descriptive system.
METHODS: Seventy-nine caregivers of children aged 0-3 years were recruited from eight countries (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Egypt, Germany, Singapore, South Africa, and UK) for two focus groups per country. A standard topic guide facilitated discussions of the EQ-TIPS experimental modified version 2.0, which included eight single-item dimensions: ‘movement’, ‘play’, ‘pain’, ‘communication’, ‘social relationships’, ‘feeding/eating’, ‘sleeping’, and ‘emotions’. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a standardised a priori framework examining comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness.
RESULTS: Most participants were mothers, with diverse representation across children’s age groups and health conditions. Overall, participants considered EQ-TIPS comprehensive and relevant for measuring their child’s HRQoL. ‘Movement’ had the highest level of comprehensibility (85%) when compared to the intended meaning, while other dimensions were interpreted more narrowly. Dimension relevance was highest (>65%) for ‘movement’, ‘emotions’, ‘pain’, ‘sleeping’, and ‘feeding/eating’. Participants suggested improvements for dimension comprehensibility and relevance. For example, ‘emotions’ was interpreted as either expression or regulation, not both; regulation was deemed more appropriate for the target ages. The ‘pain’ dimension required further clarification to focus on presence/severity of pain rather than expression. ‘Feeding/eating’ was often seen as caregiver-led and needed better description, especially for infants. ‘Social relationships’ and ‘communication’ relevance were questioned due to perceived overlap. Suggestions included rewording of ‘play’ to reduce the overlap with ‘social relationships’, and to include cognitive aspects, thereby improving relevance. Eleven additional dimensions were identified, but mentions were infrequent: for example, cognition (n=4), bowel habits (n=3), behaviour (n=3), and growth (n=3).
CONCLUSIONS: The study proposed modifications to enhance the content validity of EQ-TIPS across infants and toddlers with diverse health conditions, supporting refinement of the descriptive system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

PCR162

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Pediatrics

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×