Maintaining Orphan Drug Status at the Time of Drug Approval in European Economic Area (EEA): European Union (EU) Plus Iceland and Norway From 2015 to 2025

Author(s)

Ariane Batscheider, Dr1, Evgeniya Shlaen, M.Sc.1, Darya Schnauffer, MSc1, Adina Akkuliyeva, M.Sc.1, Trang Thanh Vu, MSc1, Stephanie Tanja Zeuch, Dr2, Jana Efremova, Dr2, Christina Meier, MSc, DPhil2, Doreen Bonduelle, Dipl. Bus. Law.1, Roger-Axel Greiner, Dr1.
1IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG, München, Germany, 2IQVIA, Madrid, Spain.
OBJECTIVES: In the EU, there are several incentives for companies to develop pharmaceutical treatments for rare diseases. An orphan drug designation (ODD) can be granted when (1) the new treatment is intended for the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease that is life-threatening or chronically debilitating, (2) the prevalence of the condition in the community must not be more than 5 in 10,000 or it must be unlikely that marketing of the medicine would generate sufficient returns to justify the investment needed for its development, and (3) no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition concerned can be authorized, or, if such a method exists, the medicine must be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. These conditions still need to apply at the time of marketing authorization. We investigated how many pharmaceuticals approved by the European Commission (EC) did or did not maintain their ODD at time of approval.
METHODS: Data of pharmaceuticals approved by the EC since 2015 were retrieved from the Union Register of Medicinal Products for Human Use on 05/05/2025. Data of ODD were retrieved from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website on 14/05/2025 and verified on 02/06/2025.
RESULTS: Since 2015, 898 products were approved by EMA, of which 684 never had ODD, 3 received ODD after first approval and 18 ODD were withdrawn prior to first approval. ODD was confirmed at approval for 161 products, withdrawn by the company for 29, and not confirmed for 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Most (161/193; 83.4%) products with prior ODD kept their status with approval, only 16.6% (32/193) did not maintain ODD (most common reason: condition of significant benefit not proven/met). At the time of approval, there is still no satisfactory treatment for many rare diseases, or a significant benefit of the new medicine is proven.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

HPR134

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Approval & Labeling

Disease

Rare & Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×