Explaining Psychiatric Comorbidities in Patients With Skin Conditions: The Importance of Clinical Characteristics and Patient-Reported Disease Impact

Author(s)

Allison FitzGerald, BA, BS1, Neuza da Silva Burger, PhD2, Rachael Pattinson, BSc, MSc, PhD3, Nirohshah Trialonis-Suthakharan, MSc4, Jennifer Austin, BA5, Chris Bundy, PhD6, Matthias Augustin, PhD2.
1Director of Operations, GlobalSkin, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 3School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 4Padvocates, Munich, Germany, 5International Alliance of Dermatology Patient Organizations, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 6School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: The prevalences for depression and anxiety disorders are estimated at 3.8% and 4% of the global population; however, these can ascend to 30% in dermatology patients. This study aimed to contribute to explain these high rates of psychiatric comorbidity by examining the associations between clinical variables, disease impact, and mental health.
METHODS: An online survey, available in 17 different languages, was conducted between June 2023 and January 2024. Adults with a self-reported dermatological condition were recruited through patient organizations and social media. Participants completed the Patient-Reported Impact of Dermatological Diseases (PRIDD; 16 items assessing physical, life responsibilities, psychological and social impact domains), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the General Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), and provided sociodemographic and clinical information. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to identify sociodemographic characteristics, clinical variables and impact domains associated with depression and anxiety.
RESULTS: 3680 participants were included, 76.4% female, mean age of 48.7±15.7 years, from 87 different countries, and across 114 dermatological conditions (e.g., 12.8% Lichen Sclerosus, 12.3% Psoriasis, 8.2% Hidradenitis Suppurativa). 1349 (36.7%) respondents scored above the threshold for clinical depression (PHQ-9≥10) and 956 (26.0%) for clinical anxiety (GAD-7≥10). Sociodemograhic characteristics (younger age, female sex) explained 3.9% and 5.2% of the variance in depression and anxiety scores, respectively. Clinical variables explained 20.1% of depression and 15.0% of anxiety scores: rare diseases, higer disease severity, presence of comorbidities, and lower satisfaction with current healthcare were associated with higher scores for both depression and anxiety; besides, being member of a patient organization was associated with lower levels of anxiety. PRIDD dimensions (higher physical, psychological and social impact; lower life responsibilities impact) explained an additional variance of 22.6% for depression and 22.8% for anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the importance of capturing the multidimensional burden of skin conditions on patients’ lives, as a significant risk factor for psychiatric comorbidities.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

PCR88

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Mental Health (including addition), Rare & Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×