Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for Self-Sampling in a National UK Cervical Screening Program

Author(s)

Amber Salisbury, PhD, Joe Hilton, PhD, Sheezah Ihsan Kausar, Masters, Shabnam Thapa, MPH, Katherine Payne, MSc, PhD, Stuart James Wright, PhD.
The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: The NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) currently involves a healthcare professional collecting a cervical sample in a clinical setting. There are limitations to this approach, including difficulty in accessing appointments and the discomfort or anxiety caused by speculum examinations. The introduction of HPV testing has enabled the development of self-sampling methods, including vaginal and urine collection. While the accuracy of these methods has been studied, it remains unclear which features of self-sampling influence preferences, acceptability, and screening uptake. We aim to: (1) Quantify preferences for cervical screening features among the UK population eligible for cervical screening; (2) Estimate uptake under different sampling collection scenarios; (3) Explore how preferences vary across sociodemographic groups.
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was developed. Attributes and levels for the DCE were identified through a literature review, expert consultation, and input from a patient and public involvement group (n=6). The final survey includes 10 choice tasks per participant, asking them to choose between two hypothetical screening options, or no screening. Data collection is expected to be completed by September, with analysis finalised by October. Results will be analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class models, and uptake calculated.
RESULTS: The final survey includes the following attributes: detection rate (ranging from 80% to 95%), sample collection method (clinician-collected vs. self-collected vaginal or urine samples), screening location, level of contact with healthcare professionals, discomfort or pain, and screening frequency (yearly to every 5 years). Results will include odds ratios for each attribute and projected uptake rates for potential implementation scenarios in the UK, presented separately for different subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study can help design a more acceptable and effective cervical screening programs tailored to the UK context, including consideration of how preferences differ between sociodemographic subgroups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

PCR60

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Patient-Centered Research

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×