Cost-Utility Analysis of AI-Assisted Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Detection in Taiwan
Author(s)
Yi-Yi Kung, PharmD1, CHING-YUAN FANG, PharmD2, Cheng Shen Chan, PharmD3, Rong-Tai Chen, PhD4, Ping-Hsuan Hsieh, PhD5.
1National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, 2National Defense Medical Center, TAIPEI, Taiwan, 3National Defense Medical Center, Taichung, Taiwan, 4TaiHao Medical Inc., Taoyuan, Taiwan, 5National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City, Taiwan.
1National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, 2National Defense Medical Center, TAIPEI, Taiwan, 3National Defense Medical Center, Taichung, Taiwan, 4TaiHao Medical Inc., Taoyuan, Taiwan, 5National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City, Taiwan.
OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among Taiwanese women, with rising incidence and mortality over the past three decades. A novel AI-assisted ultrasound system (AI-US) has been developed to improve early detection. This study evaluated whether AI-US is a cost-effective alternative to conventional ultrasound for breast cancer detection among women aged over 30 in outpatient imaging settings, from the health payer’s perspective in Taiwan.
METHODS: A decision tree was used to simulate the initial diagnostic process, incorporating sensitivity (0.8656) and specificity (0.6375) for detecting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4-5 breast cancer, based on a local retrospective study of 517 outpatients. A Markov model simulated long-term disease progression and outcomes over a 40-year horizon. Cost and utility inputs were obtained from published literature and reimbursement data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness. All costs were converted to 2023 U.S. dollars.
RESULTS: AI-US identified 97 more true-positive and 96 fewer false-negative cases per 10,000 screened women. It yielded 0.02 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $1,535, resulting in an ICER of $61,458 per QALY gained, which falls within the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of two times GDP per capita. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 48.4% probability of AI-US being cost-effective at this ICER. The probability remained stable around 50%, indicating limited variation across higher WTP thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of evaluating AI-assisted diagnostic tools in real-world healthcare settings. AI-US is likely a cost-effective strategy for early breast cancer detection in outpatient screening among women over 30 in Taiwan, offering improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the considerable uncertainty warrants further investigation.
METHODS: A decision tree was used to simulate the initial diagnostic process, incorporating sensitivity (0.8656) and specificity (0.6375) for detecting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4-5 breast cancer, based on a local retrospective study of 517 outpatients. A Markov model simulated long-term disease progression and outcomes over a 40-year horizon. Cost and utility inputs were obtained from published literature and reimbursement data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness. All costs were converted to 2023 U.S. dollars.
RESULTS: AI-US identified 97 more true-positive and 96 fewer false-negative cases per 10,000 screened women. It yielded 0.02 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $1,535, resulting in an ICER of $61,458 per QALY gained, which falls within the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of two times GDP per capita. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 48.4% probability of AI-US being cost-effective at this ICER. The probability remained stable around 50%, indicating limited variation across higher WTP thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of evaluating AI-assisted diagnostic tools in real-world healthcare settings. AI-US is likely a cost-effective strategy for early breast cancer detection in outpatient screening among women over 30 in Taiwan, offering improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the considerable uncertainty warrants further investigation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2
Code
EE299
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies
Disease
Oncology