Burden of Healthcare Waste for European Hospitals: Findings From an AI-Based Literature Research

Author(s)

Michela Canobbio, BSc, MEng1, Javier Gonzalez Durio, BPharm, MHEc, MRPharmS2, Els VAN HEREWEGEN, MLan3, Ciska Janssens-Böcker, MSc4.
1HEOR EMEA Leader, Becton Dickinson, Milano, Italy, 2BD, San Agustín del Guadalix, Spain, 3Becton Dickinson, Erembodegen, Netherlands, 4GenexAI, Newark, NJ, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Healthcare Waste (HCW) has increased dramatically over the last 30 years, constituting 1-2% of total produced urban waste. 15% of the total amount of waste is hazardous materials, requiring specific management. A systematic literature review has been conducted to extract and assess HCW waste and its cost management in hospitals across 9 European countries.
METHODS: The literature review identified sources via manual search (diverse documents/languages) and targeted (PubMed) literature review. These were AI-processed through a vector database for advanced categorization and with an environmental metrics AI agent, all with rigorous human oversight (GenexAI).
RESULTS: 355 relevant sources were identified. The analysis of metrics through AI revealed big variations and heterogeneity of data across countries: medical waste ranged from 1.5 kg/bed/day in the UK to 4.2 kg/bed/day in Spain. Plastic packaging constitutes 18-20% of daily hospital waste in Denmark, up to 60% in a Norway study, while it is estimated that in France up to 170 tons of plastic waste is produced per year. Operating rooms are significant contributors to waste, generating 20-30% of total hospital waste in Germany, and up to 70% in a French study. In the Netherlands 1’500 tons of Co2 are produced from plastic alone in operating rooms, whereas a study in Spain demonstrated that orthopedic surgeries alone could produce an average of 7.3 kg of plastic waste per procedure. Annual overall waste management costs approximately €600 million in France, €300 million in Italy, and it exceeds £700 million in the UK. There are considerable differences in the costs of managing hazardous vs non-hazardous waste (approximately a 3:1 ratio)
CONCLUSIONS: The research led to two main conclusions: 1) waste management represents a considerable burden for hospitals, requiring specific reduction strategies, 2) studies present a high level of heterogeneity and huge variations of results, highlighting the need of measurement standardization.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

HSD17

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Medical Technologies

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×