Development of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure for GastroIntestinal Recoveryafter Surgery (PRO-diGI)
Author(s)
Matthew Lee, PhD.1, Dan Baker, MBChB Medicine, PGCert Medical Education2, Debby Hawkins, PhD.3, Sue Blackwell, NA4, Deena Harij, BM, PhD.5, Gabrielle Thorpe, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD.6, David R. Churchman, BSc, MSc, PhD7, Georgina Jones, D.Phil8;
1University of Birmingham, Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birningham, United Kingdom, 2Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Surgery, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 3Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 4No affiliation, NA, United Kingdom, 5Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 6University of East Anglia, School of Health Sciences, Norwich, United Kingdom, 7InSpired Health Outcomes, Witney, United Kingdom, 8Leeds Beckett University, Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds, United Kingdom
1University of Birmingham, Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birningham, United Kingdom, 2Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Surgery, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 3Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 4No affiliation, NA, United Kingdom, 5Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 6University of East Anglia, School of Health Sciences, Norwich, United Kingdom, 7InSpired Health Outcomes, Witney, United Kingdom, 8Leeds Beckett University, Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds, United Kingdom
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Following major abdominal surgery, patients may experience significant gastrointestinal dysfunction, including post-operative ileus. Many clinical tools are used to measure this dysfunction, but there is no Patient-Reported Outcome measure specific to this group. The aim of this study was to develop a new PRO measure for this common condition.
METHODS: A four-phase approach was undertaken. Stage one used semi-structured interviews with 29 patients to explore experiences of gastrointestinal recovery and develop a draft questionnaire. Stage two solicited feedback from 18 patients and 15 clinical experts on the face validity of the proposed tool using the QQ10 (a questionnaire of questionnaires designed and validated to assess face validity). Stage three recruited 297 patients to complete the questionnaire. Principal Component Analysis reduced the items and identified the domain structure. Test-retest reliability and a pilot assessment of responsiveness were assessed in stage four in a sample of 100 and 68 patients respectively.
RESULTS: The interviews generated 27 themes across gastrointestinal recovery and general wellbeing. An initial questionnaire containing 43 items was developed. The QQ10 demonstrated high value and low burden, supporting face validity. Tests to reduce the items, and identify the domains structure resulted in a 15-item questionnaire across four domains (nausea, eating, wellbeing, and bowel function). Test-retest reliability showed ICC values >0.7 for all domains. Pilot responsiveness was demonstrated through differences in pre- and post-surgical scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-diGI is a PRO measure for gastrointestinal dysfunction after major abdominal surgery which shows good psychometric properties, and demonstrates face validity, reliability, and responsiveness. This now needs external validation to facilitate broader implementation.
METHODS: A four-phase approach was undertaken. Stage one used semi-structured interviews with 29 patients to explore experiences of gastrointestinal recovery and develop a draft questionnaire. Stage two solicited feedback from 18 patients and 15 clinical experts on the face validity of the proposed tool using the QQ10 (a questionnaire of questionnaires designed and validated to assess face validity). Stage three recruited 297 patients to complete the questionnaire. Principal Component Analysis reduced the items and identified the domain structure. Test-retest reliability and a pilot assessment of responsiveness were assessed in stage four in a sample of 100 and 68 patients respectively.
RESULTS: The interviews generated 27 themes across gastrointestinal recovery and general wellbeing. An initial questionnaire containing 43 items was developed. The QQ10 demonstrated high value and low burden, supporting face validity. Tests to reduce the items, and identify the domains structure resulted in a 15-item questionnaire across four domains (nausea, eating, wellbeing, and bowel function). Test-retest reliability showed ICC values >0.7 for all domains. Pilot responsiveness was demonstrated through differences in pre- and post-surgical scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-diGI is a PRO measure for gastrointestinal dysfunction after major abdominal surgery which shows good psychometric properties, and demonstrates face validity, reliability, and responsiveness. This now needs external validation to facilitate broader implementation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-05, ISPOR 2025, Montréal, Quebec, CA
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S1
Code
CO96
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
SDC: Gastrointestinal Disorders, STA: Surgery