Beyond Clinical Data: Assessing Usage Patterns of Real-World Home-Reported Outcomes To Capture the Full Burden of Atopic Dermatitis Symptoms and Flares
Author(s)
Samantha McStocker, B.S., Hiba Anwar, MPH, Connie Zhang, MPH, Sarah Villard, PhD, Amanda Healey, MPH;
Folia Health, Boston, MA, USA
Folia Health, Boston, MA, USA
OBJECTIVES: To describe symptom flare occurrence and treatment-use in atopic dermatitis (AD) based on home-reported outcomes (HROs), defined as data “tracks” recorded by patients using the Folia app, a digital health tracking tool used for real-world research. While AD is known to be a high healthcare utilization condition, examination of clinical or claims data alone may underrepresent the true burden of disease, as not all symptoms lead to clinical utilization. The app-based study was designed with AD patients and their caregivers, with the goal of capturing a fuller understanding of the day-to-day experience of individuals with AD.
METHODS: Analysis included 1 month of data collection from 34 individuals with self-reported AD. Participants used the Folia app to track their self-defined symptoms, treatments, flares, and management of flares. There were no specific app usage requirements; rather, participants tracked as much and as often as they chose. Patterns of app usage—including frequency, day, time, symptoms, treatments, flare incidence, and strategies used to manage flares—were examined.
RESULTS: Participants tracked a total of 39 unique symptoms and 60 unique treatments. On average, each individual tracked 4.8 unique symptoms (sd = 3.7) and 3.1 unique treatments (sd = 4.8). The app was used most frequently on Fridays and Saturdays, and most commonly in the evenings between 6-10pm. The majority of users reported managing their symptoms and flares independently: 94% of flare days did not result in clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD tracked a broad range of symptoms and treatments, demonstrating engagement with and interest in using a digital health tracking tool. Notably, the majority of symptom exacerbations were managed at home without consulting a clinician, and a large percentage of tracks were recorded outside typical timeframes when care is sought. These findings highlight the potential of HRO tracking in enhancing our understanding of disease burden in AD.
METHODS: Analysis included 1 month of data collection from 34 individuals with self-reported AD. Participants used the Folia app to track their self-defined symptoms, treatments, flares, and management of flares. There were no specific app usage requirements; rather, participants tracked as much and as often as they chose. Patterns of app usage—including frequency, day, time, symptoms, treatments, flare incidence, and strategies used to manage flares—were examined.
RESULTS: Participants tracked a total of 39 unique symptoms and 60 unique treatments. On average, each individual tracked 4.8 unique symptoms (sd = 3.7) and 3.1 unique treatments (sd = 4.8). The app was used most frequently on Fridays and Saturdays, and most commonly in the evenings between 6-10pm. The majority of users reported managing their symptoms and flares independently: 94% of flare days did not result in clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD tracked a broad range of symptoms and treatments, demonstrating engagement with and interest in using a digital health tracking tool. Notably, the majority of symptom exacerbations were managed at home without consulting a clinician, and a large percentage of tracks were recorded outside typical timeframes when care is sought. These findings highlight the potential of HRO tracking in enhancing our understanding of disease burden in AD.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-05, ISPOR 2025, Montréal, Quebec, CA
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S1
Code
PCR93
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient Behavior and Incentives, Patient Engagement, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
SDC: Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)