Presentation (CTI)

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to (1) identify and synthesize patient-reported psychosocial distress experiences and (2) evaluate their influence on the quality of life among minority men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States.
METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through comprehensive searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Epistemonikos. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducted in the U.S. (January 2014-December 2024), published in English, and focused on (1) psychosocial distress types; (2) local or advanced PCa diagnosis; (3) men aged ≥ 40 identified as African American/Black, Hispanic/Latino, or Asian; and (4) male participants. PRISMA guidelines were followed to ensure quality and transparency in the study methodology.
RESULTS: A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, with three studies employing a cross-sectional design. Most studies focused on African American/Black (40%), Hispanic/Latino (27%), and mixed racial groups (33%). Sample sizes ranged from 18 to 1,500 participants, with most studies reporting fewer than 100 participants. Key findings highlighted the significance of tailored support services, robust social support networks, regular physical activity, and interventions to bridge quality-of-life disparities in optimizing PCa care.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of psychosocial distress types and their impact on quality of life among minority men with PCa across racial subgroups. The findings emphasize the need for culturally tailored interventions to address unmet needs and improve care for minority men with PCa. Further research is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of cancer care services, such as community navigation programs, in addressing psychosocial distress and enhancing quality of life.