Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe Single Pill Combination (SPC) Versus Free Combination Treatment (FCT) in Chinese Hypercholesterolemia Adult Patients

Author(s)

Jin Peng, PhD, Yubei Han, PhD, Mingyue Zhao, PhD, Yu Fang, PhD, Minghuan Jiang, PhD;
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Xi’an, China

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was approximately 8.1% in Chinese adults. There were estimated 93.2% patients at high (>1.8 mmol/L) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk did not reach guideline recommended targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Statins combined with ezetimibe was recommended by guidelines to achieve the LDL-C goal. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single pill combination (SPC) versus free combination treatment (FCT) of Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg in Chinese hypercholesterolemia adult patients whose LDL-C was not adequately controlled despite on statin monotherapy from the perspective of public healthcare system.
METHODS: A Markov model of seven health states was developed and cardiovascular (CV) events considered in the model included coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and CV-related death. The baseline characteristic/CV risk were obtained from a local database study based on hypercholesterolemia patients on statin monotherapy and still did not reach the LDL-C goal. LDL-C reduction of SPC (43.17±16.11)% vs. FCT (29.14±29.13)% (P<0.01) of Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg was derived from a Chinese multicenter observational study. Cost and utilities were obtained from literature and 5% discount rate was applied for both cost and health outcome aligned with China pharmacoeconomic guideline. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at the 2023 one gross domestic product per capita of China (¥89,358). Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the uncertainty of model.
RESULTS: Compared with FCT, patients treated with SPC resulted in greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain of 0.145 and was associated with cost savings of 6,945 RMB per patient over lifetime. Therefore, SPC was considered as a dominant therapy in comparison with FCT of Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg in hypercholesterolemia patients in China.
CONCLUSIONS: SPC demonstrates dominant economic and health value than FCT of Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg in hypercholesterolemia patients whose LDL-C still above target despite on statin monotherapy in China from public healthcare perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-05, ISPOR 2025, Montréal, Quebec, CA

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S1

Code

EE48

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

SDC: Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), SDC: Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×