Different Symptoms Important to Kidney Cancer Patients and Clinicians

Published Jun 17, 2013
Chicago, IL, USA - The patient’s perspective is fast becoming an important component for health care decisions. For example, the Food and Drug Administration now has guidance for the development of patient-reported outcome instruments. Patients with advanced kidney cancer are most concerned about fatigue, treatment side effects, and worry about one’s condition getting worse. Kidney cancer physicians more readily focus on symptoms that suggest disease progression or factors that can reduce or delay treatment such as bone pain, fever, and weight loss. The NFKSI-19 symptom index demonstrated preliminary reliability and validity supporting its use in assessing health-related quality of life in clinical trials and routine clinical practice. Health-related quality of life is critical, particularly when curative treatment options are limited. Both the clinician and patient perspectives have been included in the article “Development and Initial Validation of the NCCN/FACT Symptom Index for Advanced Kidney Cancer,” published in Value in Health. Nan Rothrock, PhD, author of the study states, “By utilizing both patient and clinician perspectives, we have a measure that addresses patients’ concerns about quality of life as well as symptoms that are critical for treatment planning.”

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×