Self-Care Or Professional Help? The Role Of Symptom Severity

Published Sep 17, 2012
Aberdeen, UK – To design cost-effective health services, we need to understand how people choose to manage the symptoms they experience. Building on previous work, Lisa Rennie, Dr. Terry Porteous and Professor Mandy Ryan from the University of Aberdeen, evaluated how preferences for medical help increase as perceived severity of symptoms increase. Respondents to the survey said they preferred to self-manage minor symptoms of illnesses. To manage potentially serious symptoms, a medical practitioner was valued (in monetary terms) more than three times higher than self-care. However, in order to reduce the waiting time and cost of managing their symptoms, people were willing to compromise on which health professional they consulted. Dr. Terry Porteous comments “Although people seem to prefer self-management of minor conditions, experience tells us that many GP consultations are for symptoms that could be managed without medical intervention. Initiatives such as the pharmacy-led Minor Ailments Scheme in the UK, which supports people wishing to practise self-care, may help to reduce future GP consultations for minor conditions.” The article, “Preferences for managing symptoms of differing severity: A discrete choice experiment,” which describes the full details of the discrete choice experiment used to measure people’s preferences for symptom management, can be found in Value in Health, the official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information:

Related Stories

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.

ISPOR Good Practices Report Offers Guidance for Using Real-World Data From EHRs in Health Technology Assessments

Jun 17, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that proposes a framework for assessing the suitability of electronic health records data for use in health technology assessments. The report, “Assessing Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force” was published in the June 2024 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on Update my browser now