Make Her Voice Count: Understanding the Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Contraceptive Trials

Author(s)

Rupinski K1, Bernstein MC2, Kumar NS2, Murli N2, Ollis S2, Olonilua D2, Tallarico M2
1Adelphi Values, Newton, MA, USA, 2Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical endpoints have increased following regulatory emphasis on the patient voice supporting drug approval. Although contraceptives continue to be evaluated, many were approved prior to current patient-centered guidance. Contraceptives are used widely for intended (e.g., pregnancy prevention) and off-label purposes (e.g., menstrual pain, acne), and assessment of dimensions beyond pregnancy is crucial to holistically understand patient experiences. This research was conducted to understand PRO inclusion in clinical trials for contraceptives.

METHODS: A search was completed using clinicaltrials.gov to identify Phase 2-4 trials for interventional contraceptive treatments for females. Details extracted included: date of initiation, use of PROs/inclusion of PROs in endpoints, and concepts assessed and by which PROs. Trends over time were also evaluated.

RESULTS: Of trials identified, 219 were included in this review (initiated between 1997 and 2022). Seventy-three included PROs, while the remaining 146 were either unclear about use of PROs (n=52) or no PRO/potential patient-reported concept was mentioned (n=94). Thirty trials included PROs as a primary endpoint and 63 included PROs as a secondary or ‘other’ endpoint. The concepts most commonly assessed by PROs were satisfaction and bleeding/spotting. The PROs used most were questionnaires assessing satisfaction and patient diaries assessing bleeding and/or spotting. All other concepts and PROs were included in <25.0% of relevant trials. Prior to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) PRO Guidance, 29.5% of the trials specified use of PROs, whereas this rose to 40.5% after it was published.

CONCLUSIONS: While PROs were used more commonly after the FDA PRO Guidance, they were still included in less than half of trials. PROs were not used consistently or clearly detailed, and there was a limited number of concepts frequently assessed, demonstrating restrictions and inconsistencies in capturing the patient voice. Future research for contraceptive efficacy would benefit from a broadened assessment of the patient perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

PCR80

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Drugs, Reproductive & Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×