A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Effectiveness and Economic and Humanistic Burden in Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Author(s)
Wright P1, Yin L2, Theodorou E3, Dillon R3, Brancato S3, Hamilton L4, Joseph A4, Chang NN2
1Seagen Inc, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Seagen Inc, Bothell, WA, USA, 3Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL, USA, 4Adelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis, with half of patients developing metastases. NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend patients with MIBC receive neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC). However, many patients may be ineligible for cisplatin. This systematic literature review (SLR) evaluated real-world treatment effectiveness and economic and humanistic burden in patients with MIBC who received NAC+RC or RC alone to characterize unmet need in these patients.
METHODS: Literature searches conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines identified real-world studies (January 2018–June 2023) of adult patients with MIBC who received RC in the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. Publications were screened for those reporting real-world effectiveness (including median overall survival [mOS] and progression-free survival [PFS]), economic burden and humanistic burden.
RESULTS: Of 4,192 references identified, 76 were included following screening. Of these, 61 reported real-word effectiveness, 12 economic burden and 5 humanistic burden. The range of reported mOS was 1.9–6.9 years with NAC+RC (n=9) and 1.5–6 years with RC alone (n=7). Risk of progression was lower with NAC+RC than RC alone (3 studies reported real-world PFS outcomes). Eight studies reported direct costs, with inpatient costs post-RC a large component of total costs. In the US, patients receiving NAC+RC had a shorter median length of hospital stay than those with RC alone. Health-related quality of life decreased following either NAC+RC or RC alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MIBC who receive either NAC+RC or RC alone experience a high economic and humanistic burden. While NAC may improve outcomes for some patients, not all patients can tolerate NAC and more effective treatments are needed. New data are required to better characterize the impact of new treatments on patient outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
CO77
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Oncology