Timely Rheumatoid Arthritis Control With Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in Clinical Practice: Separating Successes From Opportunities for Care Improvement

Author(s)

Helfgott SM1, Huston K2, Singh JA2, Frick A3, Milligan S4, Persons D3, Soloman N5
1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 2The Center for Rheumatic Disease & Allergy-Immunology, Kansas City, MO, USA, 3Trio Health Analytics, Louisville, CO, USA, 4Trio Health Analytics, Belfast, ME, USA, 5Arizona Arthritis, Phoenix, AZ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Rapidly managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is critical given the risks associated with uncontrolled disease (severe joint damage, infection, compromised organ function). Here we examine outcomes with biologic (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients with moderate-severe disease, to determine opportunities for care improvement.

METHODS: Data: PIONEER Rheumatology, an EMR and extracted chart note database specific to patients in care by the American Rheumatology Network. Eligibility: Adult (18+ years old) patients with RA who initiated b/tsDMARDs between Aug 2020-May 2022 (index), >180 days history, ≥365 days follow up, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10 at index (closest to, but within 90 days prior), and CDAI conducted at 24±4 weeks post-index. Primary endpoint: change in CDAI scores at 24±4 weeks from index. Statistics: T-test (continuous) or Pearson’s chi-square, proportions comparisons by z-test with Bonferroni correction (categorical). Minimal important difference (MID) in CDAI: ≥6 or ≥12 reduction from baseline moderate (>10 and ≤22) or severe (>22) CDAI, respectively. Low disease activity: CDAI ≤10.

RESULTS: Study population (n=450): mostly female (83%), white (239/303, 79%), and treated with TNF inhibitors at index (70%). At 24±4 weeks post-index, 59% of patients had a reduction from baseline CDAI score ≥ MID, 11% patients had increased CDAI (worsened), 8% had no change, and 22% had decreased (improved) CDAI but <MID. Patient proportions achieving MID were not significantly different by baseline CDAI or index b/tsDMARD. A significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved MID remained on the index drug at 24w (90%) compared to the group that did not reach MID (83%, p=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 59% of patients with moderate-severe RA achieved a timely, meaningful reduction in CDAI after initiating b/tsDMARDs. The remaining 41% (11% worsened, 30% had zero to minimal improvement) represent a population that may benefit from optimized treatment choice and/or enhanced care engagement.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

CO54

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Performance-based Outcomes

Disease

Drugs, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×