Leading Predictors of Medicare Payments Vary Across Different Phases of Care Among Older Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors: Application of Interpretable Machine Learning Models
Author(s)
Siddiqui ZA1, Mbous Y2, Nduaguba S1, LeMasters T1, Scott VG3, Patel J4, Sambamoorthi U5
1West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA, 2West Virginia University, Chicago, IL, USA, 3West Virginia University, School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA, 4Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5University of North Texas Health Sciences Center, Denton, TX, USA
OBJECTIVES: To determine the leading predictors of healthcare expenditures (Medicare payments) among older adults diagnosed with incident Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) across pre-diagnosis, treatment, and post- treatment periods.
METHODS: A retrospective research design utilizing the SEER-Medicare database was employed for older Medicare beneficiaries (age >66 years) diagnosed with incident HL between 2009 and 2017. Three phases of cancer care pre-diagnosis, treatment, and post-treatment were indexed around the cancer diagnosis date with 12 months of baseline and 12 months of follow-up period for all three phases. XGBoost, Random Forest, and Cross-Validated Linear regressions on log-transformed expenditures with interpretable SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methods, were used to identify the leading predictors (from baseline period) of Medicare payment (in the follow-up period) for each phase.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1,242 patients with HL in the pre-diagnosis phase, 902 during treatment, and 873 in the post-treatment phase. The mean annual Medicare payments were $22,623 (pre-diagnosis), $84,563 (treatment), and $36,913 (post-treatment), XGBoost outperformed other models with overall performance in predicting expenditures with R2 (RMSE) values of 0.42 (1.39), 0.43 (0.56), and 0.45 (0.91) across the three phases of expenditures. Interpretable SHAP value showed baseline expenditures as a leading predictor of healthcare expenditures in the pre-diagnosis phase. Meanwhile, treatment types (immunotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery) were the leading predictors in the treatment and post-treatment phases. Furthermore, the number of prescription drugs and chronic conditions consistently ranked among top 10 predictors for Medicare expenditures.
CONCLUSIONS: As AI tools are increasingly used to develop prediction models in clinical care, policies, and population health management, AI applications should consider the disease phases in training, testing, and model implementation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
EE110
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Prospective Observational Studies
Disease
Oncology, Rare & Orphan Diseases