Cough, Dyspnea, Chest Pain or a Composite? Analysis of Key Symptoms in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) Clinical Trials

Author(s)

Castro Y1, Corey-Lisle PK2, Holt T3, Mamolo C2
1F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, 2Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA, 3PAREXEL International, Billerica, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Given its highly symptomatic nature, clinical trials often focused on “composite” endpoints of key, patient-reported symptoms of mNSCLC, including cough, dyspnea, chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, and pain. The analysis of these symptoms has been inconsistently operationalized. The objective of this research was to establish empirical support for the use of individual or composite symptoms in mNSCLC, regardless of treatment.

METHODS: EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 data from Phase 2 (GO28625, GO28753, GO28754) and Phase 3 (GO28915, GO29431, GO29436, GO29437, GO29438, GO29537) trials of atezolizumab in mNSCLC was analyzed. Different combinations of symptoms were compared. Spearman correlations were calculated to assess association between items and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves of progression-free survival (PFS) by time to confirmed deterioration of symptoms (TTCD; deterioration ≥10 points for ≥2 consecutive timepoints, or deterioration followed by death) to examine the relationship between symptom deterioration and disease progression.

RESULTS: Pooled data from 5573 patients (64.5% male, mean (SD) age 63.2 (9.4) years) showed low-moderate (0.09 - 0.44) Spearman correlations between symptoms at baseline. Only 17.2% (Dyspnea at Rest) to 29.8% (Dyspnea QLQ-C30) of patients had confirmed deterioration (CD) on any individual symptom. Median TTCD for each symptom was 5 or 6 3-week treatment cycles. K-M curves for PFS by TTCD status revealed patients who didn’t experience CD had rapid disease progression; few patients (6.2% Dyspnea at Rest to 10.5% Arm/Shoulder Pain) experienced a late TTCD corresponding to an extended PFS. Similar patterns were observed across individual symptoms as well as K-M curves for various combinations.

CONCLUSIONS: TTCD of pre-specified symptom composites provided no increased efficiency or sensitivity versus individual symptoms in this mNSCLC population, instead individual symptoms should be examined separately. Next steps will explore whether other approaches are more informative when studying symptomatic progression in this setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

MSR3

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Trials, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×