Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizotinib Versus Chemoterapy for First Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Alk+, from the Brazilian Public Healthcare System Perspective
Author(s)
Ferreira P1, Senna T2, Sebastião M2, Alexandre RF1, Almeida P1
1Pfizer, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Pfizer, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in men and women and has the highest mortality rate of all cancers except non-melanoma skin cancer. Approximately 85% of the cases are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, among these, about 3% present the ALK+ translocation. The aim of this analysis is to compare effectiveness and incremental costs between crizotinib and standard chemotherapy in the ALK+ NSCLC treatment from the Brazilian public healthcare system perspective.
METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was developed using a partitioned survival model, which followed patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC throughout a lifetime horizon, considering the transition through different health states (progression-free survival, progression, and death). The outcomes evaluated monthly were life years gained (LY) and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALY).
RESULTS: Crizotinib provides gains in terms of LY (3.67) and QALY (1.84) when compared to standard chemotherapy, with the need for incremental costs, resulting in an ICER/LY of approximately BRL 42,000 and ICER/QALY of BRL 83,500. The ICER/QALY is only 2.4 times the Brazilian GDP per capita, which is within the recent established threshold for serious diseases (3 times Brazilian GDP per capita)
CONCLUSIONS: Considering that crizotinib provides significant gains compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC in first line, it was incorporated into the Brazilian public healthcare system in December 2022.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
EE52
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology