Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians for Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-Amyloid Therapy in the United States Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

Author(s)

Biskach M1, Cambi X1, Mittler B2, Reisman J3, Berlowitz D4, Morin PJ1, Zhang R5, Tahami A5, Zhang Q5, Xia W3
1Boston University, Boston, MA, USA, 2South Texas VA Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA, 3Bedford VA Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA, 4University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA, 5Eisai Inc, Nutley, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Since February 2023, Veterans started to discuss the option of anti-amyloid therapy (AAT) for Alzheimer’s disease based on the United States Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VAHS) established criteria for use. We examined documented reasons for not adopting AAT based on shared decision-making beyond VAHS criteria-based exclusions.

METHODS:: Ineligibility for AAT for reasons other than VAHS criteria for use were ascertained by manual review of computerized clinical notes in the VAHS nationwide databases (March 13, 2023–December 31, 2023). We targeted the chart review to identify reasons for not adopting AAT that resulted from shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

RESULTS: Overall, 1668 patients were identified with an AAT-related clinical note. Initial review found 508 patient-initiated and 316 physician-initiated conversations regarding AAT. Among 629 patients considered ineligible for AAT at the time of the note (study window), 51% had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 34% had Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). The mean age was 76.8 years; 3% were Female, 9% were Black vs 83% White, and 4% were identified as Hispanic vs 92% non-Hispanic (4% unknown). Among patients with specific documentation of concerns regarding ATT, common barriers included lack of interest due to concerns regarding infusion, commuting, risk/benefit, or other issues (n=106) and lack of immediate access to AAT (n=30). Forty-eight clinicians recommended not pursuing the AAT. A portion of patients were postponing their decisions. Clinician types initiating AAT-related discussions included 258 neurologists, 73 geriatricians, 69 geriatric psychiatrists, 52 PCPs, and 38 nurses/nurse practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis described ascertainable reasons for patient exclusion from AAT documented in VAHS clinical notes. Shared decision-making regarding AAT was documented between patients and clinicians in both specialty and primary care settings. Lack of patient interest was the most frequently documented reason for not adopting AAT. Institutional resource allocation may need to address access barriers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

RWD65

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Electronic Medical & Health Records, Public Health

Disease

Geriatrics, Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×