Landscape Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease-Specific Caregiver Outcome Assessments

Author(s)

Doma R1, Suminski N2, Gold A3
1Parexel International, Durham, NC, USA, 2Parexel, San Diego, CA, USA, 3Parexel International LLC, Lafayette, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 80% of people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementia rely on caregivers. In Europe, caregivers provide 0.9 – 5.0 hours per day of informal care for patients with dementia. Longitudinal studies have shown that their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) negatively trends over time. Using caregiver outcome assessments (CareOAs) in AD trials can capture the impact of treatment on caregiver burden, HRQoL, and time spent providing care. This abstract aims to conduct a landscape analysis of AD-specific CareOAs to evaluate the content of available assessments and inform future selections for clinical trials.

METHODS: Assessments were identified through PROQOLID database on eProvide and Google Scholar. Search terms “caregiver”, “caregiver burden”, and “caregiver quality of life” were used, and results were filtered by therapeutic indication (AD). Two researchers extracted properties of the assessments from PROQOLID.

RESULTS: Nine AD/dementia CareOAs were identified. Most had validation development evidence, including caregiver (e.g., focus groups) and (n=2), clinician input (n=5), literature (n=7) and/or prior instrument review (n=7). The CareOAs contained between 12 to 71 items and recall periods ranged from the present to four months: one referenced, “over the course of the study”. Response options for the CareOAS included Likert scales (n=6) or dichotomous response scales (n=3). CareOAs measured various outcomes, which were categorized by domain: caregiver burden (n=3), grief (n=1), treatment preference (n=1), resource utilization (n=2), reaction to patient behavior (n=1), and shared activities (n=1). Among caregiver burden COAs, physical, social, and emotional domains were measured by all. Financial burden, worry, and work were also frequently assessed. Caregiving time was assessed by additional COAs.

CONCLUSIONS: While there are comprehensive and robust caregiver assessment options, they have varied content and response options. A future consensus should be made to inform the appropriate selection of CareOA content and response options in AD trials.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EPH131

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Neurological Disorders, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×