Estimation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Tardive Dyskinesia Impact Scale (TDIS), a Tardive Dyskinesia-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome
Author(s)
Farber RH1, Zhang H1, Bron M1, Mathias SD2, Stull DE3, Dunayevich E1, Perez-Rodriguez MM4, Correll CU5
1Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 2Health Outcomes Solutions, Winter Park, FL, USA, 3IQVIA, New York, NY, USA, 4Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA, 5Charité Universitätsmedizin, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Establish an MCID for the TDIS using data from two 52-week, phase 3 trials of valbenazine in US adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD): placebo-controlled KINECT3 (NCT02274558) and open-label KINECT4 (NCT02405091)
METHODS: Both anchor- and distribution-based approaches were used to estimate an MCID for TDIS, a reliable and valid 11-item questionnaire that evaluates how TD symptoms affect daily functioning. TDIS total score ranges from 0–44; higher scores represent greater impairment. Single-item Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-TD) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), with 7 responses, varying from very much improved (1) to no change (4) to very much worsened (7), were used as anchors. TDIS score changes from baseline to Week 6 in KINECT3 and to Week 8 in KINECT4 were computed from patients who received 40 mg or 80 mg valbenazine or placebo and had CGI-TD and PGIC minimal responses (score=3, representing minimally improved). The standardized response mean (SRM) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) were used in the distribution-based approaches.
RESULTS: In KINECT3 (n=201), 41% (n=83) of patients had a PGIC score of 3 and 43% (87) had a CGI-TD score of 3 at Week 6, while 32% (47) had a PGIC score of 3 and 38% (56) had a CGI-TD score of 3 at Week 8 in KINECT4 (n=148). Change from baseline in TDIS total score in both trials ranged from 3–4 points in patients with CGI-TD and PGIC scores equal to 3. The SEM was −1.66 and −1.68 and the SRM was −0.58 and −0.74 for KINECT3 and KINECT4, respectively. Combining data from anchor- and distribution-based results yielded an MCID estimate of 3-4 points.
CONCLUSIONS: An MCID of 3-4 points based on anchor- and distribution-based analyses from 2 separate studies is useful for interpreting how much change in TDIS scores is considered clinically meaningful.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
PCR68
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods
Disease
Neurological Disorders, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas