Publication Trends of Network Meta-Analyses in Europe and Asia: A Focus on Cardiovascular Disease
Author(s)
Ng A1, Choi MH2, Evans J2
1Costello Medical, Singapore, 01, Singapore, 2Costello Medical, Singapore, Singapore
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To compare trends in publications of network meta-analyses (NMAs) in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in Asia-Pacific (APAC; China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand) and Europe (United Kingdom [UK], Germany, France, Spain, Italy), with a focus on volume, collaborations and methods.
METHODS: Freely available NMAs assessing pharmacological or surgical interventions for CVD in terms of mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events, published in 2012 or later, by authors affiliated with institutions in the target countries were identified via MEDLINE and Embase. CVDs were grouped using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10).
RESULTS: Across the 193 publications identified, heart diseases such as atrial fibrillation, aortic stenosis and heart failure (ICD-10 I30–I52) were the most common indications reported (38%). 63% of publications involved authors in APAC countries and 40% from Europe. Cumulative numbers of publications from APAC surpassed those from Europe from 2018 onwards. Authors were largely affiliated with institutions in China (50%), the UK (20%) and Italy (20%). 145 publications were by authors affiliated with institutions in a single country; 91% of publications from APAC and 44% from Europe, indicating different patterns of collaboration within these regions. In terms of reporting methodologies, 39% of included publications did not specify whether a frequentist or Bayesian framework was used (43% in APAC, 34% in Europe). Among those that reported, the Bayesian framework was more commonly used.
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there is a growing trend in NMA publication counts generally, the rate of increase in APAC was higher than Europe, particularly in the years following adoption of health technology assessment (HTA) procedures in APAC. The volume of publications not reporting the framework used was substantial, despite requirements for this in reporting guidelines e.g. PRISMA. Where reported, the Bayesian framework may have been favoured due to its advocacy by some HTA bodies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
MSR75
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
STA: Drugs, STA: Medical Devices