Cost Effectiveness of Novel Antiobiotic Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in Gram Negative Infections in Greece

Author(s)

Yfantopoulos N1, Bafaloukos I2, Ntontsi P2, Yang J3, Mintzia E2, Skroumpelos A2, Karokis A4
1MSD Greece, Alimos, A1, Greece, 2MSD Greece, Alimos, Greece, 3Merck & Co., Rahway, NJ, USA, 4MSD Greece, Athens, Greece

Presentation Documents

BACKGROUND:Antimicrobial resistance is a critical public health issue. Greece has the second highest percentage of antimicrobial resistance in the European Union reporting an endemic of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections like K. pneumonia producing KPC.

OBJECTIVES: The present study assesses the cost-effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Imi/Rel) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pielonephritis, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) caused by carbapenem resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) bacteria in Greece.

METHODS: The adaptation was performed from the payer’s perspective. The model includes data from the RESTORE-IMI-1 trial and consists of two parts: a decision-tree, depicting the period from diagnosis to hospital discharge and a Markov model, projecting long-term outcomes and costs following hospital discharge. The model includes a population of patients distributed among three afore-mentioned disease categories with confirmed CR-pathogens. The model projects costs and outcomes within a 45-years’ time horizon, costs and LYs are discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Outcomes included Life Years (LY’s) as well as resource use and mortality for each comparator . A deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) was performed to identify the input parameters impact on ICER, and a Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) was run to examine the robustness against collective uncertainty of all parameters. Comparators in the model include piperacillin-Tazobactam (pip/tazo) and imipenem/cilastatin (Imi).

RESULTS:

Imi gives 18.14, Pip/Tazo gives 20 additional LY’s whereas Imi/Rel yields 22 LY’s. Imi/Rel showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1812€ per LY gained compared to Pip/Tazo and 211€ per LY gained compared to imi. The PSA showed in 94.5% of the 5,000 simulations imi/rel being cost-effective versus Imi under the Greek willingness-to-pay threshold of 52,770 €/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Imi/Rel is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with (cIAI), (cUTI), and (HABP/VABP) caused by CR GN bacteria in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE248

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Novel & Social Elements of Value, Public Health

Disease

SDC: Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×