Understanding Symptoms and Meaningful Change in Patient Global Impression Scales for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (adv/met NSCLC): A Qualitative Research Study

Author(s)

Kelly K1, Cardellino A2, Shah M2, Hanlon J3, Taiyari S4, Roborel de Climens A5, Stojadinovic A2
1IQVIA, New York, NY, USA, 2GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA, 3GSK, Waltham, MA, USA, 4GSK, Stevenage, UK, 5IQVIA, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES: NSCLC, particularly at advanced stages, causes significant symptom burden. This study aimed to gain insight into patients’ experience with adv/met NSCLC and understand what constitutes meaningful change in cancer symptoms using Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Change (PGIC) instruments.

METHODS: Semi-structured, qualitative, 45–60-minute open-ended question interviews were conducted by telephone/virtual platform with US patients with adv/met NSCLC. Patients discussed their most bothersome NSCLC symptoms and impacts, and rated their ‘current’ (last 7 days) and ‘previous’ (6–12 months ago) symptoms using PGIS and PGIC, which were also debriefed.

RESULTS: Nineteen patients (aged 28–71; 95% female) with Stage IV NSCLC were interviewed. Most were receiving targeted therapy (63%) and were diagnosed with adv/met NSCLC >12 months prior (79%). All patients understood well the PGIS/PGIC items/response options; however, some had difficulty distinguishing cancer symptoms from treatment side-effects when conducting evaluations. The most commonly reported symptoms included shortness of breath/difficulty breathing, fatigue, cough and pain. Most patients (14/19) rated their ‘current’ cancer symptoms as ‘mild’ or ‘moderate’ on the 5-point PGIS. Nearly all patients deemed a 1-point PGIS improvement or worsening to be meaningful (14/17 and 16/18 patients, respectively; 2 patients reported ‘no current symptoms’, 1 reported ‘very severe’ symptoms and therefore could not be included in the improvement/worsening assessments). Comparing ‘current’ versus ‘previous’ symptoms on the 5-point PGIC, 6 patients were ‘a little worse’, 5 were ‘much better’. For 10/18 patients, ‘no change’ was considered meaningful (positively or negatively). A 1-point change (‘a little better/worse’) in PGIC was deemed meaningful by 17/19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Cancer symptoms PGIS and PGIC were clear and provided valuable insights into symptoms of adv/met NSCLC. A 1-point meaningful change threshold in PGIS/PGIC was identified as an anchor for patient-reported outcomes.

Funding: GSK (215353). Editorial support by Fishawack Health, funded by GSK.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

PCR37

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×