Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products From Promise to Practice: Understanding Reimbursement and Access Disparities in Western Europe

Author(s)

Marlies Boeren, PhD1, Maud Brijs, MSc1, Kristof Theys, PhD1, Ben Barron-Millar, PhD2, Malcolm Boyd, MSc2, Malte Glüsen, MSc3, Ingo Hantke, PhD3, Priscila Mazzola, PhD2, Melanie van Riemsdijk, PharmD, PhD1.
1Kintiga, Ghent, Belgium, 2Kintiga, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 3Kintiga, Hannover, Germany.
OBJECTIVES: ATMPs have the potential to provide significant clinical benefits, and potentially cure, for patients with debilitating and life-threatening diseases. However, access to ATMPs across Western Europe remains unequal. With the introduction of Joint Clinical Assessments (JCA), this research aims to explore whether this initiative can help reduce access disparities by identifying both country-specific and cross-national factors that influence successful reimbursement and those contributing to access disparities across different countries.
METHODS: For EU-authorized ATMPs, national HTA assessments and outcomes were analyzed by screening HTA databases from Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Germany, England, Ireland, and Spain. The analysis involves qualitative in-depth review of the submitted evidence and HTA outcomes both within and across the listed countries.
RESULTS: A total of 28 ATMPs have received EU marketing authorization from 2009 until May 2025, of which 8 have been withdrawn or not renewed. Among the countries investigated, availability is highest in Germany (n=17) and lowest in Ireland (n=5). Despite the similarity of the submitted clinical evidence, reimbursement outcomes varied significantly across countries. Disparities in access to ATMPs were driven by factors such as the availability of standard of care, the appraisal of clinical evidence, and flexibility in financial arrangements. Cross-country access was particularly successful for indications with a high unmet need, where no targeted treatment alternatives were available, regardless of price.
CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement outcomes are determined by the local availability of standard of care, the appraisal of clinical evidence, and the flexibility of financial arrangements. Consequently, a streamlined relative effectiveness assessment through JCA alone is unlikely to fully address access disparities, as appraisal occurs at the national level. Therefore, additional measures at the country level are necessary to ensure faster and equitable access to ATMPs, in alignment with the objectives of the HTA regulation.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2

Code

PT22

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Oncology, Rare & Orphan Diseases, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin), Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×