Developing a Novel Model Structure for Evaluating Treatment Sequences in Oncology Pathways: A Pilot in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Author(s)
Lucy Beggs, MSc1, Kusal Lokuge, PhD1, Yuanyuan Zhang, MSc2, Lindsay Claxton, MSc2.
1National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
1National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: NICE technology appraisals (TAs) evaluate cost-effectiveness of interventions at individual decision points in a treatment pathway. However, the treatment sequence generated from a series of appraisals may differ from the optimal sequence estimated for the whole pathway. NICE commissioned a pilot to assess a “pathways approach” for evaluating treatment sequences in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Existing model structures to evaluate pathways require patient-level simulation or use numerous tunnel states, with potential operational barriers around data access, ease of use and interpretation. We aimed to develop a novel model structure for evaluation of oncology treatment sequences to overcome these challenges. The model was designed in Microsoft Excel for stakeholder accessibility.
METHODS: A novel ‘nested partitioned survival’ model structure was conceptualised to evaluate treatment sequences in oncology pathways. The structure builds on principles of partitioned survival models, with new methods to estimate line-specific transition probabilities, costs and QALYs. The structure was used to develop a pilot model which covered a NSCLC pathway with multiple treatment lines and subgroups based on histology and PD-L1 expression. The model was informed by network meta-analyses, previous TAs and real-world evidence.
RESULTS: The ‘nested partitioned survival’ structure was developed into a fully-executable model evaluating treatments in a complex NSCLC pathway. The cohort model structure circumnavigated the need for patient-level data without using tunnel states. The model had probabilistic and deterministic functionality. The model showed the most optimal treatment sequence for patients and the most cost-effective treatment at each node. List price net monetary benefits fell between -£87,335 and £14,214. The model included placeholders for additional genetic mutation subgroups to enable continued use as the NSCLC pathway evolves.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel structure for evaluating treatment sequences in oncology pathways has potential to improve cost-effectiveness decisions about treatment sequences, and has potential to support future development of oncology reference models.
METHODS: A novel ‘nested partitioned survival’ model structure was conceptualised to evaluate treatment sequences in oncology pathways. The structure builds on principles of partitioned survival models, with new methods to estimate line-specific transition probabilities, costs and QALYs. The structure was used to develop a pilot model which covered a NSCLC pathway with multiple treatment lines and subgroups based on histology and PD-L1 expression. The model was informed by network meta-analyses, previous TAs and real-world evidence.
RESULTS: The ‘nested partitioned survival’ structure was developed into a fully-executable model evaluating treatments in a complex NSCLC pathway. The cohort model structure circumnavigated the need for patient-level data without using tunnel states. The model had probabilistic and deterministic functionality. The model showed the most optimal treatment sequence for patients and the most cost-effective treatment at each node. List price net monetary benefits fell between -£87,335 and £14,214. The model included placeholders for additional genetic mutation subgroups to enable continued use as the NSCLC pathway evolves.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel structure for evaluating treatment sequences in oncology pathways has potential to improve cost-effectiveness decisions about treatment sequences, and has potential to support future development of oncology reference models.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2
Code
PT4
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Methodological & Statistical Research
Disease
Oncology