ISPOR PUBLISHES NEW TASK FORCE REPORT ON CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS (COAs)

Published Nov 4, 2015
Princeton, NJ—November 4, 2015—The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) published a new Task Force Report, “Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs): A Conceptual Foundation – Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force,” in the September/October 2015 issue (Volume 18, Issue 6) of Value in Health. Clinical trials are an essential part of testing whether a new medical treatment is safe and effective. A clinical outcome assessment (COA) is used in a clinical trial to measure patients’ symptoms, overall mental state, or physical function related to the effects of a disease or condition. COAs are of increasing interest to health care stakeholders working toward a more patient-centric approach to drug development. A COA is the best way to determine if and how a medical treatment in a clinical trial is affecting patient functioning and feeling, i.e. patient outcomes. Additionally, COAs are the patient outcomes in study endpoints that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers when determining a medical product’s drug labeling information. “This Report provides a basic understanding of COA measurement principles,” stated co-author, John H. Powers, III, MD, FACP, FIDSA, associate clinical professor of medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine. “The Task Force Report covers important COA fundamentals, including terminology, what demonstrates a beneficial effect, how patient assessments relate to the objective of showing a treatment’s benefit, and how these assessments are used in clinical trial endpoints.” Lead author, Marc K. Walton MD, PhD, senior scientific director, Janssen Research and Development and former associate director for Translational Medicine, Office of Translational Sciences, CDER, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), added “This new ISPOR COA Task Force Report is important because it provides recommendations for the multiple stakeholders involved in drug development research and medical product evaluation. It is also timely as the FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) are both looking at better ways to measure patient outcomes in clinical trials, including the review and qualification of COAs.” This is the ninth ISPOR Task Force Report based on the US FDA Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment (PRO, ClinRO, ObsRO, PerfO) Methodology Task Force Reports can be viewed on the ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Index webpage at http://www.ispor.org/workpaper/practices_index.asp. ISPOR Task Force Reports in development include Clinician Reported Outcomes and Measurement of COAs Used in Rare Disease Clinical Trials. The full article may be found at http://www.ispor.org/task-force-report_clinical_outcome-assessment.pdf. Additional information on the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment – Emerging Good Practices Task Force may be found at http://www.ispor.org/taskForces/Clinical-Outcomes-Assessment.asp.

###

Related Stories

ISPOR Tackles Health Disparities with New Research Primer

Jan 22, 2025

ISPOR announced today the publication of a report from the ISPOR Health Equity Research Special Interest Group intended to establish key concepts for conducting health equity research that enables investigators to examine—and ultimately reduce—unfair social inequities in health.

Global Expert Panel Releases Good Practices Guidance for Developing or Updating Health Technology Assessment Guidelines

Jan 14, 2025

ISPOR announced today the publication of a tripartite task force report outlining good practices for developing or updating health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.

Rethinking Value Assessment for Orphan Drugs

Dec 18, 2024

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that document challenges in rare disease evidence and economic evaluation and policy as well as ways in which the environment is evolving to address them.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×