What Is The Best Approach To Hip Replacement For Different Patient Groups?

Published Sep 25, 2013
Calgary, AB, Canada - Advanced hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic condition causing severe joint pain and loss of joint function. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recognized as one of the most effective interventions to relieve pain and improve function, but with increasing life expectancy, people are now expected to outlive a primary THA, and require revision surgery. Therefore, other surgical approaches, like hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), have been considered, particularly for younger, active patients. Researchers at the University of Calgary in Calgary, Canada compared the benefits and costs of HRA versus THA. A decision analytic model was constructed to estimate the expected cost-effectiveness of HRA compared to THA as measured by cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The absolute differences between THA and HRA were small, with substantial uncertainty around the estimate of cost effectiveness. For younger patients (less than 50 years old) and male patients, however, HRA cost less and was associated with more QALYs. Total hip arthroplasty was a better option only in older patients (over 60 years old) and female patients. The results show that, on average, HRA was preferred above THA for younger and male patients, but THA is still a reasonable option if the patient or clinician prefers. The full study, “Cost-Utility of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Compared to Conventional Total Hip Replacement in Young Active Patients with Osteoarthritis,” is published in Value in Health.

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.

ISPOR Good Practices Report Offers Guidance for Using Real-World Data From EHRs in Health Technology Assessments

Jun 17, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that proposes a framework for assessing the suitability of electronic health records data for use in health technology assessments. The report, “Assessing Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force” was published in the June 2024 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now