Patients' Age Is Important When Setting Priorities

Published Jul 23, 2013
Tromsø, Norway - Several studies on priority setting preferences have shown that people think that differences both in patients’ ageand in remaining lifetime should be taken into account. Researchers from the University of Tromsø in Norway set out to determine what is more important: A patient’s age or their remaining lifetime if left untreated? Survey results from a Norwegian population sample provided strong support for the ‘fair innings’ argument that total lifetime inequalities should be reduced.  Differences in patients’ remaining lifetime without treatment did not matter, implying little support for the ‘end of life’ argument that a short life expectancy makes patients entitled to preferential treatment. When faced with pairwise choices between hypothetical patients, the majority of respondents would prioritise the younger patient even if the older patient had shorter remaining lifetime if left untreated. Professor Jan Abel Olsen, PhD, lead author on the study states, "It is more important to reduce inequalities in people's total lifetime than in their remaining lifetime."  The full study, “Priority Preferences: “End of Life” Does Not Matter, But Total Life Does,” is published inValue in Health.

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.

ISPOR Good Practices Report Offers Guidance for Using Real-World Data From EHRs in Health Technology Assessments

Jun 17, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that proposes a framework for assessing the suitability of electronic health records data for use in health technology assessments. The report, “Assessing Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force” was published in the June 2024 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×