Pricier Antibiotic Fidaxomicin May Be Most Cost-Effective Treatment Of Clostridium Difficile Infections

Published Feb 17, 2013
Ann Arbor, MI, USA - Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) are increasingly responsible for alarming levels of patient illness and death. Because of the recurring nature of the disease, it's not uncommon for patients to relapse and require costly re-hospitalization or long-term care. The antibiotic fidaxomicin is a newer treatment that can lower recurrence of infection. Hospitals have been slow to incorporate fidaxomicin as a first-line therapy for CDI, however, because of its high cost. In a recent study “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Evaluating Fidaxomicin versus Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States,” published in Value in Health, a research team at the University of Michigan aimed to provide insight into the cost-benefit discussion surrounding this new antibiotic. The researchers developed a model to determine the cost-effectiveness of treating CDI with fidaxomicin compared to other available medications. Their findings showed that in most scenarios tested, despite fidaxomicin's higher up-front cost, it may be a cost-effective option for the treatment of CDI. In today's financially conscious environment, this study provides valuable information that will help guide health policy regarding treatment of patients with CDI.

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.

ISPOR Good Practices Report Offers Guidance for Using Real-World Data From EHRs in Health Technology Assessments

Jun 17, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that proposes a framework for assessing the suitability of electronic health records data for use in health technology assessments. The report, “Assessing Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force” was published in the June 2024 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×