Proton Pump Inhibition Most Cost-Effective Preventative Approach In Stress Ulcer Bleeding

Published Jan 17, 2013
Quebec, Canada - Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) are acid suppressing drugs widely used in medicine, including in the prevention of stress ulcer bleeding (SUB) in critically ill patients in an intensive care unit setting. As a side-effect, these medications can promote ventilator-assisted pneumonia (VAP). The comparative effectiveness and costs of these medications in preventing SUB is not fully understood. A study, “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Stress Ulcer Bleeding Prophylaxis with Proton Pump Inhibitors, H2 Receptor Antagonists,” published in Value in Health, set out to assess which preventative medication, PPI or H2RA, is the most cost-effective when trying to prevent stress ulcer bleeding in critically ill patients in an intensive care unit setting. The results of the study indicated that the probabilities of bleeding and pneumonia (a side-effect of therapy) were 1.3% and 10.3% when using PPI prophylaxis versus 6.6% and 10.3% for H2RA prophylaxis, respectively. Considering lengths of stays and per diem costs, the average costs per no complication were US$58,700 for PPI prophylaxis and US$63,920 for H2RA prophylaxis. “This decision model suggests, based on existing published evidence to date, that proton pump inhibitors represent the most cost-effective approach when considering stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis in the critically ill patients of a modern-day intensive care unit," reports Dr. Alan Barkun, professor of Medicine in McGill University and lead investigator of this economic analysis.

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×