Where Do We Need Best Practices In Development And Reimbursement Of Personalized Medicine?

Published Nov 17, 2012
Durham, NC, USA - Personalized medicine technologies are currently caught between high expectations of improving health outcomes and uncertainty about navigating the rapidly changing regulatory and reimbursement environment. This is because they do not fit neatly into the existing routes by which traditional biopharmaceuticals and diagnostics reach the market -- including health technology assessment and reimbursement processes. In order for the field to optimally evolve, establishment of HEOR best practices that are consistent and transparent to both manufacturers and payers will be required. In the article, “Challenges in the Development and Reimbursement of Personalized Medicine - Payer and Manufacturer Perspectives and Implications for Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Report of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Development and Reimbursement Working Group,” published in Value in Health, the Personalized Medicine Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) examined challenges relating to development and reimbursement from the payer and manufacturer perspectives. These two stakeholder groups have a major impact on development and uptake of novel, personalized therapies. The SIG sought to address key challenges associated with personalized medicine including the translation of knowledge into clinical practice, demonstrating value and delivering the new technologies through evolving health care models and the implications for HEOR. The paper identified five major areas in particular need of best practice development: research prioritization and early value assessment; clinical evidence development; health economic assessment; addressing health technology assessment challenges; and new incentive and reimbursement approaches for personalized medicine. “Personalized medicine is a rapidly evolving field and many markets are beginning to develop processes and criteria focused on evaluation and uptake of these technologies.” says Eric Faulkner, Chair of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Reimbursement & Development Working Group, and Director, Global Market Access, Consulting at Quintiles. “As with any new area, there are decision and methodological challenges, including those where new HEOR approaches can help streamline value assessment - ISPOR is a driving force toward this objective. The SIG paper seeks to identify key areas where development of best practices may help ensure appropriate evaluation of personalized medicine technologies.”

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×