Further Evidence For The CHU9D In Adolescents

Published Nov 17, 2012
Sheffield, UK - The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) is a generic preference-based measure of health related quality of life originally developed with children age 7-11 years. Recently, there has been interest in its potential application with adolescents, with some evidence already published that it performs well. Research carried out in Adelaide, Australia, gives further support to the use of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) measure with adolescents. This research assesses its performance in conjunction with another paediatric measure, the KIDSCREEN-10. This study, “Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the Child Health Utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population,” was co-authored by Katherine Stevens from the University of Sheffield and Julie Ratcliffe from Flinders University. A web-based survey was administered to 961 adolescents. The survey included the CHU9D and another well-validated paediatric measure, the KIDSCREEN-10. The performance of the CHU9D was assessed and the measures were compared in terms of their coverage of items pertinent to adolescents’ quality of life, correlations between dimensions of quality of life, and overall scores. The CHU9D demonstrated good ease of use and validity with adolescents, discriminating well between those with and without medical conditions. The strongest degree of correlation was found with the only item in common between the measures (sad). Says Dr. Stevens, “This research provides further evidence for the practicality and validity of the CHU9D in the economic evaluation of adolescent health care and public health programmes.” The results of this study are published in Value in Health, the official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

Promoting Fairness in Funding Decisions

Jun 24, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that offer new tools to help health policy makers weigh fairness alongside cost-effectiveness when deciding which treatments and programs to fund.

Listening to Patients in the Real World

Jun 23, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR announced today the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report outlining 9 areas to strengthen the robustness, transparency, and feasibility of real-world patient-reported outcomes studies.

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×