Conception Of A Model

Published Sep 17, 2012
Princeton, NJ, USA – Inevitably it happens: your car breaks down and you have to ask yourself, “What is the problem – really?” Health care researchers must ask the same question and then proceed to design a model that appropriately fits that problem. In the paper, “Conceptualizing a Model: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-2,” expert health care research modelers describe best practices for conceptualizing models. Lead author, Mark Roberts, MD, MPP, references one recommendation that states, “Several model types may be suitable. Some problems are more naturally represented in some types than others.” Dr. Roberts goes on to say, “The important aspect of this recommendation is that it suggests that the structure and complexity of the problem itself should be the primary driver in determining the appropriate type of modeling method used to represent the problem. Too often, a modeling method that is less well suited to the task is used because of familiarity with the tool, rather than an appropriate match between the characteristics of the problem and the advantages of a particular modeling type.” This paper is one of the seven papers in the series on modeling study best practices and is jointly published in Value in Health, the official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), and Medical Decision Making, the official journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM).

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health. For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

The Ozempic Paradox: How Spending Billions on Weight-Loss Drug Would Actually Reduce Overall Medicare Costs

Oct 14, 2025

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a landmark study by researchers at the University of Washington, Curta, Inc, and the University of North Carolina showing that broad Medicare coverage of semaglutide in diabetes, obesity, and liver disease could generate significant cost savings while delivering substantial health benefits to beneficiaries. The report, “Comprehensive Access to Semaglutide: Clinical and Economic Implications for Medicare,” was published in the October 2025 issue of Value in Health.

ISPOR Launches New Content on Whole Health

Sep 23, 2025

ISPOR announced that it has launched new website content on whole health, a topic of increasing importance as health systems across the globe grapple with providing the best possible healthcare to patients within constrained budgets.

Landmark Analysis in Value in Health Uncovers Potential Research Efficiency Gains

Sep 15, 2025

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR announced the publication of a landmark scoping review that provides a comprehensive mapping of patient preference studies across key medical domains, revealing the first robust evidence base for advancing meta-analyses and benefit transfer methods in healthcare decision-making.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×