Combining Individual-Specific Preferences With Cost Data To Inform Health Care Decisions

Published Jul 17, 2012

Rotterdam, The Netherlands – Offering patients the possibility to “choose” their own care program (i.e., customized care) can be beneficial for both patients and hospitals.

Yet, there is little guidance on how to determine the cost-effectiveness of customized care while taking into account the preferences of specific patients. In the article, “Combining Individual-Level Discrete Choice Experiment Estimates And Costs To Inform Health Care Management Decisions About Customized Care: The Case of Follow-Up Strategies after Breast Cancer Treatment,” to be published in Value in Health, the authors demonstrate a method that combines cost data and individual-specific preference data to help health care decisions makers decide about issues with regard to customized care. The method is illustrated for the case of follow-up after breast cancer treatment. The study was authored by Tim M. Benning, Merel L. Kimman, Carmen D. Dirksen, Liesbeth J. Boersma, and Benedict G.C. Dellaert.

The article’s main finding is that offering patients a fully customized program, that allows them a choice from all possible follow-up programs, leads to higher utility and lower costs than the current standardized program. Health care decision makers are likely to benefit from using (the results of) this methodological approach when they consider implementing customized health care programs. The approach may help them to find ways to save costs and increase patient satisfaction.


Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health. For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×