Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review

Author(s)

Tugwete C1, Wang X2, Le N3, Dang QT3, Park C4
1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadephia, PA, USA, 2The University of Texas at Austin, Charlotte, NC, USA, 3The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 4The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line therapy utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS: A scoping review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of ICI therapies in RCC published between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2023. Eligible articles were selected: 1) original research articles, 2) studies with objectives related to CEAs and/or cost-utility analysis, 3) studies focused on the United States, and 4) studies written in English. The characteristics of treatments (e.g., treatment line, class of medication, and cost-effectiveness) and approaches of CEAs (e.g., outcomes, models) were extracted and summarized, and the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool was used to evaluate the quality of each article.

RESULTS: Among the 20 included studies, the majority of them addressed advanced clear cell RCC (n = 15), assessed the cost-effectiveness of combination therapies (n = 14), and used a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per quality-adjusted life year (n = 16). Nivolumab + ipilimumab (n = 4) and pembrolizumab + axitinib (n = 3) were consistently identified as cost-effective first-line options for treating RCC compared to sunitinib. However, nivolumab + cabozantinib was not considered cost-effective compared to sunitinib (n = 2) and cabozantinib (n = 1), with price reductions for nivolumab suggested to achieve that favorable cost-effectiveness. Key factors influencing cost-effectiveness included the cost of treatment therapies, average patient weight, projected disease progression, and patient survival. The QHES scores ranged from 70 to 99 with a mean score of 92.4 (SD = 7.2).

CONCLUSIONS: Several first-line ICC regimens in RCC were found to be cost-effective, including nivolumab + ipilimumab and pembrolizumab + axitinib. ICC prices were identified as the key factor for favorable cost-effectiveness. This information could help guide decision-making among US payers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE325

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Organizational Practices, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Academic & Educational, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×