Patient-Centric Assessment of Treatment Experience in Breast Cancer: Development and Validation of a Patient Questionnaire
Author(s)
Gurjar K1, Rattanavong B2, Bennetts L2, Sahota J1, Ouerghi M2, Ammendolea C3, Asselah J4, Bartlett S4, Brezden-Masley C5, Croke J6, Hijal T4, Kildea J7, Papadakos J8, Watson L9, Soliman D10
1Amaris Consulting, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Amaris Consulting, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Canadian Breast Cancer Network (CBCN), Montreal, QC, Canada, 4McGill, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 8Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada, 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Limited, Dorval, QC, Canada
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among Canadian women (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) and treatments can substantially affect health-related quality of life. Understanding the impact of interventions on Canadian patients' quality of life is crucial in promoting patient-centered care. Our objective was to develop and validate a questionnaire that captures Canadian patient experiences and preferences regarding breast cancer medication(s).
METHODS: Adults previously treated for breast cancer and other cancer patients were recruited through the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation (QBCF) and Canadian Breast Cancer Network (CBCN) patient organizations. Expert recruitment targeted oncologists, radiation-oncologists, and researchers. Following a literature review and collaboration with experts, draft questions focusing on the impact of treatment-related side effects were generated and adapted based on initial feedback from patients. Content validity was assessed in two phases: 1) two rounds of a modified Delphi panel to gather inputs and elicit consensus (defined a priori as ≥70% of panelists in agreement) on patient questions, and 2) 1:1 interviews following the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines. Changes also included suggestions from interviewees.
RESULTS: Three patients and four Canadian experts (one health-service researcher, one radiation-oncologist, and two medical oncologists) participated in the two-round Delphi panel. Panelists’ comments on wording and relevance of question items were incorporated in the revised questionnaire. Subsequently, eight patients and seven experts provided additional feedback on revised questionnaire. Plain language editing, order of questions, and response options were adjusted based on participants’ comments.
CONCLUSIONS: Final questionnaire consists of 17 questions, refined based on input from patients and experts. Based on expert review, this questionnaire can capture breast cancer patient experiences and preferences on medications to help better match patients with treatments. Additional validation testing is planned to establish the properties of the questionnaire and identify norms.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
PCR191
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology