Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor Cell Enumeration-Based Liquid Biopsy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of the Peer-Reviewed Clinical Literature

Author(s)

Cristofanilli M1, de Snoo F2, Stork-Sloots L2, Hansen T3, Garay CA4, Lazaro S3, Chabut D5, Picardo F5, Simonelli C5, Kuhr F6, Spinner D6
1Weill Cornell, New York, NY, USA, 2Medex15, Amsterdam, NH, Netherlands, 3Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Huntingdon Valley, PA, USA, 4Stemline Therapeutics, Menarini Group, New York, NY, USA, 5Menarini Silicon Biosystems SpA, Bologna, Italy, 6Menarini Silicon Biosystems Inc, Huntingdon Valley, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) enumeration is a liquid biopsy testing approach for which the peer-reviewed evidence base has grown rapidly in recent years, especially in metastatic breast cancer for which an FDA-cleared assay exists. In the current research, we aimed to assess publicly-available, peer-reviewed evidence for clinical utility of CTC testing in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed was conducted investigating use of the FDA-cleared CellSearch® CTC assay in MBC. More than 130 peer-reviewed publications from 2004-2022 were reviewed for utility along with any published follow-on studies.

RESULTS: Evidence for the significance of CTCs in MBC staging and prognosis was confirmed in numerous published studies; one analysis on pooled data from 1,944 patients across 17 European centers indicated that CTC levels and changes in CTC levels during the course of treatment had greater prognostic utility than standard serum tumor markers (Bidard, Lancet Oncol 2014). Another pooled analysis of 2,436 patients with MBC suggested CTC enumeration can stratify Stage IV disease irrespective of standard clinical and molecular factors, e.g. disease site and subtype (Cristofanilli, Crit Rev Hem Oncol 2019). Moreover, multiple studies demonstrated utility in monitoring changes in disease status and at least six included comparisons of CTCs to radiographic imaging for identifying early changes in disease status and response to therapy. In some cases, detectable changes in CTCs preceded imaging detection by ≥2 months (Liu, JCO 2009). One multicenter RCT (n=755) showed that CTC-guided therapy significantly improved survival outcomes (Bidard, JAMA Oncol 2021).

CONCLUSIONS: The peer-reviewed clinical literature confirms the clinical utility of CTC enumeration in MBC for disease stratification and monitoring, treatment selection and response prediction, with implications for CTCs to be applied in routine clinical practice as a tool for treatment decisions and more efficient allocation of healthcare resources/ cost reduction.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

CO119

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Medical Technologies, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinical Trials, Diagnostics & Imaging, Performance-based Outcomes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×