Timing of Initiation of Clinical Interventions in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Grading of the Evidence

Author(s)

Landfeldt E1, Ferizovic N2, Buesch K3
1ICON Plc, Stockholm, Sweden, 2BresMed, Sheffield, UK, 3PTC Therapeutics Switzerland GmbH, Steinhausen, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severely debilitating and ultimately fatal genetic disease characterized by progressive muscle degeneration. Following improvements to life expectancy in DMD, the medical management of the disease has shifted to more anticipatory therapeutic strategies to achieve prevention, early identification, and treatment of complications. The objectives of our study were to review, synthesize, and grade published evidence of the impact of the timing of initiation of clinical interventions in DMD.

METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for records of studies published from inception up until November 19, 2021, reporting evidence of the impact of the timing of initiation of clinical interventions in DMD. We synthesised extracted evidence into nine outcome categories: cardiac health and function; gastrointestinal health; lower extremity and motor function; mental health; respiratory health and function; scoliosis; survival; upper extremity function; and weight, height, and BMI. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS: We included 11 publications encompassing 1,692 patients with DMD from seven countries (Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America). Six (55%) studies reported evidence of an impact of the timing of initiation of glucocorticoids on loss of ambulation, cardiomyopathy, fractures, forced vital capacity, and height and BMI; four (36%) of cardiac medication (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, and eplerenone) on left ventricular size and function and survival; and one (9%) of lower limb surgery on motor quotients. The overall quality of the body of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS: We show that the evidence of the impact of the timing of initiation of clinical interventions in patients with DMD is scarce and of generally low quality. Further research of this topic is warranted to help inform treatment guidelines in this indication.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

HPR68

Topic

Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×