Budget Impact of Baricitinib for Patients with Severe Alopecia Areata

Author(s)

Fenske C1, Rosettie K2, Lu T3, Ferrufino C4, Borns M1, Johnson N1, Morrow P1
1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2IQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA, 3IQVIA, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4IQVIA, SPRINGFIELD, VA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by nonscarring hair loss. Severe AA, defined as >50% score on the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT), is prevalent in 0.04-0.09% of the US population. Corticosteroids, minoxidil, and immunomodulators are used to treat AA; however, there are no FDA-approved therapies. Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor being investigated for treating severe AA. The budget impact of adding baricitinib to a commercial formulary for severe AA treatment was estimated from a US payer perspective.

METHODS: A budget impact analysis was conducted using a comparative cost determination framework. Starting with a hypothetical plan of one million lives, the number of patients with severe AA eligible for baricitinib was estimated. Market basket comparators were identified based on the National Alopecia Areata Foundation treatment algorithm, Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts studies, and a Lilly real-world treatment patterns study. Equi-proportional adoption of baricitinib was assumed, with baricitinib uptake increasing from 0.7% to 3.0% over the 5-year time horizon. All treatments were assumed to have a 12-month treatment duration and a new cohort entered the model each year. Treatment costs were from published wholesale acquisition costs and excluded rebates and cost-sharing. Dosing, administration, and monitoring requirements were from product prescribing information and published literature. Unit costs were from publicly available fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were performed by varying all parameters by ±20%.

RESULTS: The net 5-year budget impact was $1,383,345 (11.7% budget increase) or $0.023 per member per month (PMPM). OWSA results remained within ±$0.005 PMPM of the base case, with results most sensitive to population and epidemiology inputs and projected baricitinib uptake.

CONCLUSIONS: The addition of baricitinib to a formulary is expected to have a negligible impact on a commercial plan’s budget when considering a market basket that reflects real-world treatment patterns.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE325

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×