Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Following Sintilimab Plus Platinum and Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study (ORIENT-12)
Author(s)
Zhou C1, Gao G1, Fan Y2, Liu L3, Zhang L4, Cang S5, Zhou J6, Li B7, Yang Y8, Li J8
1Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China, 2Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, China, 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 4Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China, 5Henan provincial people’s hospital, Henan, China, 6The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China, 7Beijing Chest Hospital of Beijing Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 8Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
Background In ORIENT-12 trial, sintilimab plus gemcitabine and platinum provided a significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement comparing to placebo plus gemcitabine and platinum in Chinese patients with advanced/metastatic squamous NSCLC. This abstract summarizes PRO results. Methods 357 participants were randomized (179 in sintilimab and 178 in placebo arm). PRO was assessed using LCSS and QLQ-C30 before the first dose, at each imaging evaluation and end-of-treatment visit. Clinically meaningful differences were defined as ≥10 points on a 0-100 scale, except for LCSS three-item global index (3-IGI; ≥30 points). Deterioration was defined as the onset of ≥10-point increase from baseline. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results PRO compliance rates maintained high until week 30 Baseline scores for each item were similar between arms. During the overall treatment period, QLQ-C30 scores were maintained regardless of the addition of sintilimab [Least square mean changes from baseline (95%CI): sintilimab: -1.04 (-3.42, 1.33); placebo: -0.74 (-3.33, 1.85); Between-group difference (95%CI): -0.30 (-3.81, 3.22)]; LCSS total score, 3-IGI, and average symptom burden index were maintained for both groups. LCSS composite endpoint and respiratory symptoms endpoint showed statistically significant improvement at week 6 and 12 for both arms, but changes did not reach a clinically meaningful difference. Sintilimab arm showed a numerical trend towards delayed deterioration across most LCSS and QLQ-C30 items. Notably, sintilimab arm showed significantly delayed in pain and major symptoms in QLQ-C30, as well as blood in sputum (Median: 56.9 vs 44.9 weeks, HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.84, p=0.006) and painful sensations (Median: 49.1 vs 44.0 weeks, HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.95, p=0.027) in LCSS. Conclusion The addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy treatment maintained the quality-of-life and delayed the main symptoms deterioration compared to placebo. The data support sintilimab plus platinum and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
PCR7
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinical Trials, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Value of Information
Disease
Drugs, Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic