A Cost of Control Analysis of Liraglutide Versus Other ANTI-Diabetic Therapies in the Treatment of Patient with Type 2 Diabetes in China
Author(s)
Shen A1, Zhu P1, Ning L1, Fang P1, Xing C2
1The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, 2Novo Nordisk (China) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Beijing, 11, China
OBJECTIVES : The aim was to evaluate the cost of control for achieving composite treatment goals of blood glucose, weight and hypoglycaemia with liraglutide 1.2 mg once-daily versus other anti-diabetic therapies in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) . METHODS : Cost of control means the cost per patient successfully treated by anti-diabetic therapies, which was calculated by plotting relative treatment costs against efficacy. In this study, efficacy was measured by the proportions of patients reaching a composite treatment goal of HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and without hypoglycaemia. The clinical data were based on ‘Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD)’ clinical trial programme. Relevant comparators were glimepiride, rosiglitazone, insulin glargine and exenatide. The numbers needed to treat (NNTs) for patients achieving the composite endpoint at week 26 in each treatment group were calculated also. Treatment cost was captured from a Chinese healthcare perspective, which includes drug and needle cost. Drug dosage from LEAD project combined with price of drug and needle from averaged procurement of 2020 in China were used. RESULTS : By calculation, NNTs for liraglutide 1.2mg (3.1) were lower compared to exenatide (4.0), insulin glargine (6.7), glimepiride (12.5) and rosiglitazone (16.7). In terms of the cost of control to achieve the composite endpoint, liraglutide 1.2mg costs less (¥16 405) compared to the other commonly used therapies. Cost with exenatide, insulin glargine, glimepiride, and rosiglitazone group was ¥18 732, ¥29 614, ¥31 253.9 and ¥50 523, consequently, amount spent on bringing per patient to composite endpoint was higher with 14%, 81%, 91% and 208% of corresponding groups compared to liraglutide 1.2 mg group. CONCLUSIONS : The efficacy-to-cost ratios with liraglutide 1.2 mg were superior to glimepiride, insulin glargine, rosiglitazone and exenatide on successfully treating patients in a Chinese setting, which represent as a cost-saving approach for patients with T2D in China.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PDB13
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Drugs