Joint Modelling of Forced Vital Capacity Decline and Time to Hospitalization Outcomes in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Author(s)

Stock C1, Kreuter M2, Del Galdo F3, Miede C4, Khanna D5, Wuyts W6, Hummers L7, Alves M8, Schoof N8, Allanore Y9
1Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 2Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases,Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 3Scleroderma Programme NIHR BRC and Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 4mainanalytics GmbH, Ingeheim, Germany, 5University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 6University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, 8Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 9Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES : Joint modelling can be used to determine whether a biomarker can serve as a surrogate for a clinically important endpoint that may otherwise be difficult to measure, which is of particular relevance in rare diseases. We used this approach to assess the validity of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline as a surrogate endpoint for hospitalization-associated endpoints in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

METHODS : Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data were applied to data from the Phase III SENSCIS® trial, which assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with SSc-ILD during the treatment period over 52 weeks. A joint model was fitted for each endpoint (time to first: "all-cause hospitalization or death”; “SSc-related hospitalization or death”; and “admission to emergency room [ER] or hospital followed by admission to intensive care unit [ICU] or death”). The “estimated slope” of FVC% predicted was the shared parameter, using all FVC values recorded during the SENSCIS® trial prior to hospitalization events. Independent implementations of the methodology with an available SAS macro and an R package were applied to validate the results.

RESULTS : FVC decline had a statistically significant impact on the risk of all-cause and SSc-related hospitalizations or death (both P<0.0001). An FVC decrease of 5% corresponded with a 1.81-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] of hazard ratio [HR]: 1.42, 2.30) and 1.91-fold (95% CI of HR: 1.41, 2.60) increase in risk of “all-cause hospitalization or death” and “SSc-related hospitalization or death”, respectively. However, FVC decline did not impact the risk of “admission to ER or hospital followed by admission to ICU or death” (P=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS : We found a consistent association between FVC decline and hospitalization-associated endpoints in patients with SSc-ILD. Our findings provide evidence that FVC decline may serve as a surrogate endpoint for clinically important hospitalization-associated endpoints.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PRS3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Drugs, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×