BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF INTRODUCTION OF RITUXIMAB BIOSIMILAR IN THE UNITED STATES FROM A PAYER PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Ektare V1, Liu R2, Stephens J2, Al Taie A3, Shelbaya A4
1Pharmerit India Private Limited, Mumbai, MD, India, 2Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA, 3Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA, 4Pfizer Inc.; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Heliopolis, C, Egypt

OBJECTIVES : Rituximab-pvvr, a biosimilar of intravenously (IV) administered rituximab, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and microscopic polyangiitis. The present study conducted a budget impact analysis (BIA) to understand the potential financial effect of introducing rituximab-pvvr in a US health plan.

METHODS : A BIA was developed using Microsoft Excel to evaluate the budget impact of rituximab-pvvr over a 3-year time frame from a payer perspective. Target population was patients to be treated with rituximab (IV rituximab, or subcutaneous rituximab and hyaluronidase human) for approved indications, estimated based on published literature. A 70% market shift was assumed from originators to rituximab-pvvr. Drug costs of rituximab originators were based on average sales price (ASP), with a 6% mark-up. A discount of 20% was applied for rituximab-pvvr relative to IV rituximab, estimated as biosimilar ASP plus 6% of the originator’s ASP. Administration cost was based on the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the model robustness.

RESULTS : In a hypothetical 10-million-member health plan, 754 patients were estimated to be treated with rituximab originators or a biosimilar in year 1 and 764 patients in year 3. Switching from originators to rituximab-pvvr resulted in a total cost saving of $1,226,292 in year 1 ($0.01 per member per month [PMPM], $1,625 per patient per year [PPPY]) and $3,779,047 in year 3 ($0.03 PMPM, $4,947 PPPY), more than half attributed to DLBCL population. Varying biosimilar discount to 15% and 40% resulted in a cost saving of $792,865 and $2,960,004 respectively in year 1. Increasing ASP markup to 10% resulted in a cost saving of $1,208,964.

CONCLUSIONS : The results suggest a potential cost saving with switching from rituximab originators to biosimilar rituximab-pvvr, primarily driven by the lower cost of rituximab-pvvr.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PBI17

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, Multiple Diseases, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×